ERA16LA293 · Cessna 150G UNDESIGNAT
Cessna 150G UNDESIGNAT · Accident: flight control system malfunction/failure en route
From Montauk Airport (MTP) to Brookhaven Calabro Airport (HWV)
Event
- NTSB case
- ERA16LA293
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- API-reported fatalities
- 0 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- 0
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Cessna 150G UNDESIGNAT
- Aircraft type
- Cessna 150
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N3666J
- Operator
- Unknown
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Montauk Airport (MTP), Montauk, NYTo Brookhaven Calabro Airport (HWV), Shirley, NY
- Aircraft age
- About 50 years (built 1966)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- En route · cruise
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Flight control system malfunction/failure
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
No findings designated as a cause are recorded in the NTSB data yet.
Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
The student pilot and flight instructor were en route to the airport, with the airplane cruising at 4,500 ft above mean sea level, when the student noticed a roughness and vibration coming through the control wheel. He told the flight instructor about it and then noticed that the left elevator tip was hanging down 6-10 inches from its normal mounting position. The flight instructor took control of the airplane and noticed that the left elevator was moving up and down uncontrollably. The flight instructor made a 7-mile-long, straight-in approach to the runway, where the airplane touched down firmly without further incident. Examination of the elevator and horizontal stabilizer revealed that the airplane’s elevator was substantially damaged. The left side of the elevator was bent downward, and the left outboard elevator attachment bolt had backed out of the nutplate. In addition, the right elevator attachment bolt would move in the nutplate when the elevator was moved up or down. With the outboard left side of the elevator no longer attached to the horizontal stabilizer, it is likely that the air loads imparted onto the partially supported elevator during the flight bent it and resulted in the reduced pitch controllability. Further examination of the attachment bolts from both the left and right side of the elevator revealed that both displayed signs of thread wear on the end of the bolt that would have been fully engaged with the nutplate. Both nutplates displayed corrosion outside the threaded area on the backside of each nutplate, and the nutplate from the left side would not hold specified torque and displayed evidence of cross-threading, which may have occurred either before or during replacement of the bolts about 6 years earlier. Review of maintenance records indicated that two new bushings and elevator attachment bolts had been installed about 6 years before the accident, but the records did not reflect if the hinge parts were replaced at that time. Review of the airplane manufacturer’s service manuals revealed that supplemental inspection guidance had been issued for inspection of the horizontal stabilizer, elevator, and attachments for signs of damage, fatigue, or deterioration. The airplane had undergone an annual inspection about 6 months before the accident. It is likely that the damage and deterioration of the elevator’s left bolt and nutplate should have been evident during the most recent annual inspection, as well as previous inspections. Review of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Service Difficulty Reporting program database revealed that since 1979, seven other reports of the elevator hinge attachment bolt backing out had been submitted. According to the FAA, the main issues identified included excessively worn attachment hardware and the use of incorrect attachment hardware, with corrosion possibly a contributing factor. As a result, in May 2017, the FAA issued a special airworthiness information bulletin to alert owners, operators, maintenance technicians, and inspectors of the potential for loose bolts at the elevator attachment points on certain models of the airplane type and recommended performing the supplemental inspections detailed in the airplane manufacturer’s service manuals.
Probable cause
Maintenance personnel’s inadequate maintenance and inspection of the airplane, which resulted in the left elevator attachment bolt backing out of the nutplate, and partial inflight separation and damage of the elevator.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record ERA16LA293
- Event ID
- 20160816X44909
- Case number
- ERA16LA293
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 949fe3b0a97bb050dbdcdc4a376e8233a251a872320b605b9a4cf15823e799d9; retrieved 2026-09-16T04:09:53.513Z.