Li-2 crash near Tashauz Airport
Aeroflot (Turkmen UGA, Ashkhabat OAO) Lisunov Li-2 · Design deficiencies, poor organisation of air traffic control
From Tashauz to Ashkhabat
Event
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- Event fatalities
- 5 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- Occupants
- Unknown
- Survivors
- Unknown
- InjuriesFatal: death within 30 days. Serious: over 48 hours in hospital within a week, most broken bones, severe bleeding, nerve or organ damage, or serious burns. Minor: anything less. Glossary
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- Airline
Lisunov Li-2
- Aircraft type
- Lisunov LI-2
- Category
- Airplane · from aircraft type
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- CCCP-71209
- Onboard fatalities
- 5
- Route
- From TashauzTo Ashkhabat
Cause areas
- Aircraft › Aircraft power plant
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems
- Personnel issues › Task performance
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability
- Environmental issues › Operating environment
From the investigation findings the Wikipedia article reports, sorted into the NTSB's cause areas with AI assistance.
Not plotted · Not plotted: the Wikipedia article gives no coordinates, and its site names no town or airport that matches exactly.
From the Wikipedia article
The Li-2 crash near Tashauz Airport was an aviation accident that occurred on Wednesday, 10 October 1973 in Tashauz Oblast (Turkmen SSR) involving an Aeroflot Li-2, in which 5 people were killed.
Crash
The crew of the 165th flight detachment was operating a flight carrying 1,500 kg of cargo — water in the centre-section tanks — and 125 kg of mail. Also on board was 1 staff passenger — an aviation technician of a Mi-1 helicopter. Takeoff was made at 08:07 Moscow time. At 08:08 the crew reported: “After takeoff, on the first turn”. The controller gave the instruction “1200”. Then the crew reported: “Making an approach for landing, left engine has lost revs”. 10 seconds later the crew reported that they would approach for landing on the takeoff heading. The controller replied: “Come in”. After that no further reports were received from the aircraft. According to eyewitness testimony, at a height of 50-60 m the aircraft began a left turn with a slight bank (5-10°). The propeller of the left engine was feathered, and the landing gear was retracted. After completing the turn, the flight proceeded on a magnetic heading reciprocal to the landing heading, with a high pitch angle, losing height and speed. To avoid a head-on collision with trees 10 m tall and residential kibitkas, the crew attempted to clear the obstacles by pulling back on the control column. Having finally lost speed, at 08:11, 3 km north of the airport abeam the runway, the aircraft went into a right bank and a vertical dive and struck the ground in a field at an angle of 90°. The fuselage was destroyed up to frames 12-14 and partially burned. The actual weather at the time of the accident was: cloud 5/0 oktas, middle, upper, visibility 10 km, wind 90°, 7 m/s, pressure 759 mm Hg, t=+9°C.
Investigation and cause
Investigation
The commission established that the crew had promptly detected the drop in revs of the left engine. In the interval while the crew was assessing what was happening and feathering the propeller, the aircraft lost speed and turned left by up to 30-40°, so the crew decided to land on the takeoff heading with a left turn. Finding that flight without descending was impossible, the crew decided to make a forced landing in a field at a chosen site. Seeing at the last stage of the flight that the aircraft was at low height below the calculated descent path and would inevitably collide with obstacles, the crew cleared them by pulling back on the control column. The flight speed then fell below the minimum manoeuvring speed. The aircraft went into a spin attitude and struck the ground with the nose section of the fuselage at an angle of about 90°. The crew did not use the opportunity to land straight ahead immediately after detecting the drop in engine revs, but began making a turn towards the airfield.
Conclusions of the investigation
The immediate cause of the crash was the failure of the left engine in the climb mode up to 100 m and the impossibility, in the resulting situation, of continuing flight without descending.
The crash was facilitated by the complicated conditions (low height, presence of obstacles) when making the forced landing. The premature descent of the aircraft below the calculated path led to the crew, while clearing the obstacles, being unable to cope with piloting the aircraft due to the reduction of speed below the minimum manoeuvring speed.
Contributing causes: insufficient organisation of air traffic control at Tashauz airport — the KDP controller committed violations of radio exchange phraseology, and after receiving the crew's report of the engine failure he did not keep visual watch on the aircraft.
The commission was unable to establish the true cause of the drop in revs of the left engine. The commission suggested that this could have been caused by a short-term over-enrichment of the mixture due to sticking of the needle of the carburettor float chamber, which, based on an analysis of accidents with Li-2 aircraft over the last 10 years, is a common design and manufacturing defect of this unit.
Subsequently GOS NII GA carried out a study of the units of the left engine. It was established that the position of the spool of the 3-way fuel cock relative to the cock body differed from that established by the technical commission. Instead of the 60-70 % stated in the report, the blockage of the cock's inlet opening was 92 %. The opening to the left engine was completely blocked, to the right engine — by 50-60 %. The spring of the 3-way cock's detent could have been compressed to a length of 12.7 mm only if the detent ball was on one of the cams of the cock control shaft, that is, the cock was in an unlocked position.
On the basis of this conclusion, the cause of the failure of the left engine was insufficient fuel supply due to 92 % blockage of the inlet cross-section of the 3-way cock of the fuel system.
Probable causes of the incomplete opening of the cock could have been:
a) failure of the locking mechanism of the fuel cock due to possible shrinkage of its spring;
b) erroneous actions of the flight engineer in operating the aircraft's fuel system in accordance with the Flight Manual (RLE).
Translated into English with AI assistance from the Russian Wikipedia article “Катастрофа Ли-2 близ аэропорта Ташауз” (revision 154272048, retrieved 2026-09-19) by its authors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Extracted as plain text: references, tables, images and some sections are left out; the translation may contain errors, and long articles were cut to their first 700 words. Read the article
Sources
Russian Wikipedia article: Катастрофа Ли-2 близ аэропорта Ташауз
- Translation
- Into English with AI assistance; names of linked operators and aircraft types from Wikidata. It may contain errors.
- Revision
- 154272048 · 2026-08-06 · retrieved 2026-09-19
- Wikidata
- Q48941719
- Licence
- Text CC BY-SA 4.0, by the article's authors; Wikidata CC0; town positions GeoNames (CC BY 4.0)
Where each value comes from
- Record
- ru Wikipedia article "Катастрофа Ли-2 близ аэропорта Ташауз" (page 7070812, revision 154272048), translated into English with AI assistance
- Date
- Wikipedia infobox: date
- Place and country
- Wikipedia infobox: site
- Map position
- none
- Aircraft, operator and route
- Wikipedia infobox: aircraft type, registration, operator, origin and destination; route airports from the linked airport articles' Wikidata codes (OurAirports)
- Operation
- Reviewed correction (2026-09-26): An Aeroflot Li-2 crew carrying cargo and mail: a state airline transport flight. The article: "was operating a flight carrying 1,500 kg of cargo — water in the centre-section tanks — and 125 kg of mail"
- Fatalities
- Wikipedia infobox: aircraft fatalities
- Ground fatalities
- not stated in the Wikipedia infobox
- Summary
- Wikipedia infobox: summary
Source notes (1)
- Wikipedia · Facts from the Russian Wikipedia article's infobox, translated into English with AI assistance, not checked against an investigation report. Independent review pending.