Aeroflot Flight 103
Ilyushin Il-14P (T) · Controlled flight into terrain
From Vnukovo International Airport (VKO) to Copenhagen Kastrup Airport (CPH)
Event
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- Event fatalities
- 23 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- Occupants
- Unknown
- Survivors
- 0
- InjuriesFatal: death within 30 days. Serious: over 48 hours in hospital within a week, most broken bones, severe bleeding, nerve or organ damage, or serious burns. Minor: anything less. Glossary
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- Airline
Ilyushin Il-14P (T)
- Aircraft type
- Ilyushin IL-14
- Category
- Airplane · from aircraft type
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- CCCP-L1874 („SSSR-L1874“)
- Operator
- Aeroflot
- Onboard fatalities
- 23
- Route
- From Vnukovo International Airport (VKO)To Copenhagen Kastrup Airport (CPH)
Cause areas
- Personnel issues › Action/decision
- Environmental issues › Operating environment
From the investigation findings the Wikipedia article reports, sorted into the NTSB's cause areas with AI assistance.
Approximate · Estimated position: Copenhagen, near the place the Wikipedia article names. Not the accident site.
From the Wikipedia article
Aeroflot Flight 103 (flight number: SU103, callsign: AEROFLOT 103) occurred on 15 August 1957. On that day, an Aeroflot Ilyushin Il-14P on a flight from Moscow to Copenhagen with a stopover in Riga crashed. After colliding with a chimney of the Ørstedværket power station while approaching the destination airport, the aircraft plunged into the Sydhavnen canal of the city of Copenhagen. All 23 occupants of the aircraft died in the incident.
Accident sequence
The aircraft took off from Riga Airport at 05:40 local time. The weather forecast issued by Riga Airport for the route and the landing point at Kastrup Airport predicted favourable weather conditions with a cloud height of 300–600 metres and horizontal visibility of 10 kilometres. When the aircraft arrived in Copenhagen, the weather had changed dramatically. Fog with poor visibility drifted in waves over Kastrup Airport, which then developed further into fog patches with a cloud base of 60 metres and a horizontal visibility of 1,700 metres. The aircraft overflew the airport at 08:17 at an altitude of 1,500 metres and was observed by air traffic control, which cleared the descent and approach. At the stated time the weather directly at the airfield had improved somewhat. Under the influence of the wind, the fog shifted to the approach area west and north-west of the airfield. Air traffic control thereupon instructed the crew to initiate a new approach to runway 12. The captain apparently tried to follow the air traffic control instructions exactly, but did not understand the instructions because the controller communicated at a fast pace in English and used code expressions that were not provided for in the established procedures. Nevertheless, four minutes later he began an approach to runway 12. Due to poor visibility, the captain reduced his altitude in order to establish visual contact with the ground when the aircraft, 6.7 km short of runway 12, clipped the chimney of the Ørsted Værket power station. On impact the right wing was torn off and fell onto the power station grounds. The aircraft plunged into the Sydhavnen canal, about 150 m wide, and sank to a depth of 5 metres.
Investigation and cause
Cause
It was determined that the crew continued visual flight under instrument meteorological conditions and that the pilot in command reduced altitude below the prescribed minimum altitude in order to establish visual contact with the ground, until the right wing struck an obstacle. Russian investigators considered that the support provided by air traffic control was inadequate, that the weather information transmitted to the crew was incomplete, and that the landing clearance was issued too early, since the crew had fuel reserves for two hours of flight and could therefore have waited until the weather improved.
Translated into English with AI assistance from the German Wikipedia article “Aeroflot-Flug 103” (revision 269761779, retrieved 2026-09-19) by its authors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Extracted as plain text: references, tables, images and some sections are left out; the translation may contain errors, and long articles were cut to their first 700 words. Read the article
Sources
German Wikipedia article: Aeroflot-Flug 103
- Article
- Aeroflot-Flug 103
- Translation
- Into English with AI assistance; names of linked operators and aircraft types from Wikidata. It may contain errors.
- Revision
- 269761779 · 2026-08-18 · retrieved 2026-09-19
- Wikidata
- Q16152293
- Licence
- Text CC BY-SA 4.0, by the article's authors; Wikidata CC0; town positions GeoNames (CC BY 4.0)
Where each value comes from
- Record
- de Wikipedia article "Aeroflot-Flug 103" (page 12848798, revision 269761779), translated into English with AI assistance
- Date
- Wikipedia infobox: date
- Place and country
- Wikipedia infobox: site
- Map position
- place the Wikipedia infobox site links (Wikidata coordinates)
- Aircraft, operator and route
- Wikipedia infobox: aircraft type, registration, operator, origin and destination; route airports from the linked airport articles' Wikidata codes (OurAirports)
- Operation
- flight number in the article title
- Fatalities
- Wikipedia infobox: aircraft fatalities
- Ground fatalities
- not stated in the Wikipedia infobox
- Summary
- Wikipedia article lead
Source notes (1)
- Wikipedia · Facts from the German Wikipedia article's infobox, translated into English with AI assistance, not checked against an investigation report. Independent review pending.