FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

Japan Coast Guard training aircraft emergency landing

18 Apr 2023 · Usa, Ōita Prefecture, Japan

Cessna 172 · Loss of engine power due to detachment of an intake hose

From Kitakyushu Airport to Kitakyushu Airport (training flight)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
GAA23WA137
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Unknown · led by another country; figures from NTSB notifications
Event fatalities
0 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
Occupants
Unknown
Survivors
2
InjuriesFatal: death within 30 days. Serious: over 48 hours in hospital within a week, most broken bones, severe bleeding, nerve or organ damage, or serious burns. Minor: anything less. Glossary
2
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
Government
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Not recorded

Cessna 172

Aircraft type
Cessna 172
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
JA395A
Onboard fatalities
0
Route
From Kitakyushu AirportTo Kitakyushu Airport (training flight)
Aircraft age
Not recorded
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Non-U.S., Non-Commercial
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
En route
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Loss of engine power (partial)
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

No findings designated as a cause are recorded in the NTSB data yet.

Approximate · Estimated position: Usa, Ōita, the place the Wikipedia article names. Not the accident site.

From the Wikipedia article

The Japan Coast Guard training aircraft emergency landing (Kaijō Hoanchō kunrenki fujichaku jiko) was an aviation accident involving a Japan Coast Guard light aircraft (trainer) that occurred on 18 April 2023 (Reiwa 5) in Usa, Ōita Prefecture. Owing to engine trouble, it made a forced landing on farmland.

Course of the accident

A training aircraft (type: Cessna 172, registration: JA395A; hereafter “the aircraft”) belonging to the Kitakyushu Aviation Training Center of the Miyagi Branch of the Japan Coast Guard School departed from Kitakyushu Airport at around 9:15 am on 18 April. On board were 2 people, an instructor in his 40s and a trainee in his 20s.

The purpose of the flight was training, and the trainee was flying the aircraft until the trouble occurred. After take-off, while they were conducting training over Usa to develop a feel for handling, including raising engine power to 100%, they heard a “bang” from the front and power dropped. The instructor radioed Tsuiki Air Base, which was responsible for air traffic control, saying “Engine power won't come up. We will make an emergency landing”, and at around 10:02 the aircraft landed in a field in Matsuzaki, Usa. According to Flightradar24 records, it had begun to descend at around 9:53, and at 10:01 it set its transponder squawk to 7700.

The forced landing was carried out with the instructor at the controls. After landing, the crew themselves reported to the fire department.

The original plan had been to return to Kitakyushu Airport at around 10:30.

The aircraft ended up upside down after the forced landing, but the 2 crew suffered only minor injuries (neck sprains), and their lives were reportedly not in danger.

Investigation of the accident

Following the occurrence of the accident on 18 April 2023, the Japan Transport Safety Board appointed aircraft accident investigators and carried out interviews with the people involved, examinations of the aircraft and the weather, analysis of various flight records and so on. Representatives of the United States, the state of design and manufacture of the aircraft, and of Germany, the state of design and manufacture of the engine, took part in the investigation.

Because the investigation was taking time and it would be difficult to complete it within 1 year of the accident, the Japan Transport Safety Board published an interim report on 28 March 2024, adopted the aircraft accident investigation report on 25 September 2025, and published it on 30 October of the same year.

The report presumed that because the loss of engine power made it impossible to maintain altitude, the aircraft made a forced landing on farmland, flipped forward after touching down, and was heavily damaged when the vertical stabiliser struck the ground. As for the cause of the loss of engine power, it presumed that the intake hose had come off, resulting in a naturally aspirated condition that led to incomplete combustion, and as the background to the intake hose detaching, it pointed to the possibility that the intake hose, which had been removed during maintenance work carried out the previous day, had not been reattached properly.

Regarding piloting and decision-making, the report found that the instructor, feeling that actual engine power was lower than indicated, judged that the aircraft could not reach Kitakyushu Airport and switched to an emergency landing on farmland in Usa, and that he selected and approached a spot facing directly into the wind, without obstacles such as high-voltage lines and where the impact could be expected to be reduced, which was an appropriate approach meeting the factors set out in the FAA handbook. In addition, taking into account that he had prepared for the forced landing, anticipating a flip on touchdown, by checking seat belts and instructing a safety posture, it assessed that the occupants did not suffer serious injury because the instructor's judgement and piloting skills were appropriate.

As measures to prevent recurrence, the report called on the Japan Coast Guard to ensure thorough maintenance and post-maintenance checks in accordance with the maintenance manuals and other documents specified by the designers and manufacturers of the aircraft and engine. It also stated that the engine's designer and manufacturer (the STC holder) needed to enable the pilot to recognise intake system abnormalities through warnings or the like, and to modify the FADEC software and so on so that accurate engine power values are displayed even when the intake hose has come off.

This instructor was killed in the line of duty the following year while serving as first officer in the Haneda Airport ground collision.

Translated into English with AI assistance from the Japanese Wikipedia article “海上保安庁訓練機不時着事故” (revision 108813817, retrieved 2026-09-19) by its authors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Extracted as plain text: references, tables, images and some sections are left out; the translation may contain errors, and long articles were cut to their first 700 words. Read the article

Sources

Japanese Wikipedia article: 海上保安庁訓練機不時着事故
Article
海上保安庁訓練機不時着事故
Translation
Into English with AI assistance; names of linked operators and aircraft types from Wikidata. It may contain errors.
Revision
108813817 · 2026-03-19 · retrieved 2026-09-19
Wikidata
Q126894267
Licence
Text CC BY-SA 4.0, by the article's authors; Wikidata CC0; town positions GeoNames (CC BY 4.0)
NTSB record GAA23WA137
Event ID
20230427107159
Case number
GAA23WA137
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Where each value comes from
Record
ja Wikipedia article "海上保安庁訓練機不時着事故" (page 4765675, revision 108813817), translated into English with AI assistance; merged with NTSB case GAA23WA137 (events / aircraft)
Date
Wikipedia infobox: date
Place and country
Wikipedia infobox: site
Map position
Wikipedia: place the Wikipedia infobox site links (Wikidata coordinates)
Aircraft, operator and route
Wikipedia infobox: aircraft type, registration, operator, origin and destination; route airports from the linked airport articles' Wikidata codes (OurAirports); gaps and aircraft details from NTSB record GAA23WA137
Operation
government agency named in the article title
Fatalities
Wikipedia: Wikipedia infobox: aircraft fatalities
Ground fatalities
Wikipedia: not stated in the Wikipedia infobox
Summary
Wikipedia infobox: summary
Source notes (2)
  • One occurrence in two sources, merged: the Wikipedia article "Japan Coast Guard training aircraft emergency landing" and NTSB case GAA23WA137, matched by the same aircraft registration and date. For this event outside the United States Wikipedia's values are used where the two differ; each value names its source.
  • No bulk values were replaced by the NTSB case API.