Ozark Air Lines Flight 965
Douglas DC-9-15 and Interstate Airmotive Cessna 150F · Mid-air collision
Event
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- Event fatalities
- 2 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- Occupants
- 51
- Survivors
- 49
- InjuriesFatal: death within 30 days. Serious: over 48 hours in hospital within a week, most broken bones, severe bleeding, nerve or organ damage, or serious burns. Minor: anything less. Glossary
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- Airline
Aircraft 1 · Douglas DC-9-15
- Flight
- OZ965
- Aircraft type
- Douglas DC-9
- Category
- Airplane · from aircraft type
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N970Z
- Operator
- Ozark Air Lines
- Onboard fatalities
- 0
- Occupants
- 49
- Survivors
- 49
- InjuriesFatal: death within 30 days. Serious: over 48 hours in hospital within a week, most broken bones, severe bleeding, nerve or organ damage, or serious burns. Minor: anything less. Glossary
- Not stated
- Route
- From Chicago, Illinois, U.S.To St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL)
Aircraft 2 · Cessna 150F
- Aircraft type
- Cessna 150
- Category
- Airplane · from aircraft type
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N8669G
- Operator
- Interstate Airmotive
- Onboard fatalities
- 2
- Occupants
- 2
- Survivors
- 0
- InjuriesFatal: death within 30 days. Serious: over 48 hours in hospital within a week, most broken bones, severe bleeding, nerve or organ damage, or serious burns. Minor: anything less. Glossary
- None · no survivors
- Route
- From Lambert FieldTo Lambert Field
Cause areas
- Organizational issues › Development
- Personnel issues › Psychological
- Environmental issues › Operating environment
- Personnel issues › Action/decision
From the investigation findings the Wikipedia article reports, sorted into the NTSB's cause areas with AI assistance.
Approximate · Coordinates from the Wikipedia article; not checked against an investigation report.
From the Wikipedia article
Ozark Air Lines Flight 965 was a scheduled commercial flight from Chicago, Illinois, to Lambert Field in St. Louis, Missouri, with a scheduled intermediate stopover at Greater Peoria Regional Airport in Peoria, Illinois. On March 27, 1968, the Douglas DC-9-15 jetliner operating the flight, carrying 44 passengers and five crew, collided in mid-air with a single-engined Cessna 150F while both aircraft were on approach to the same runway at Lambert Field. The DC-9 landed safely with no injuries to any of its 49 occupants, while both pilots in the two-person Cessna died in the collision and subsequent ground impact.
Accident
At 5:49 p.m., Ozark Air Lines Flight 965, was en route to Lambert Field and was transferred to St. Louis Approach Control. It was daylight and clear weather conditions prevailed, with high, thin, broken clouds and 15 mi visibility reported, but surface winds were strong, bearing 170° at 15-20 kn. The DC-9 pilots initiated an instrument approach to runway 12R, but before reaching the outer marker, they reported to approach control that they had the airport in sight. At 5:55 p.m., approach control cleared the pilots for a contact approach to runway 17, which the pilots acknowledged, and the controller transferred the flight to the airport control tower. The pilots made a left turn. At 5:56 p.m., the pilots reported to the tower that they were on a right base leg for runway 17, and the controller advised them of Cessna N8669G ahead and to the right. The pilots did not respond to the controller regarding the traffic advisory, but the CVR recorded one pilot saying "I don't see it (out there) at all", to which another replied "Naw."
Cessna N8669G was on a visual flight rules (VFR) instructional flight and the pilots contacted the tower for landing instructions. After making numerous calls to other aircraft, the controller instructed the Cessna pilots to "report right downwind" (referring to a downwind airfield traffic pattern turn). The controller then called Ozark 965 to confirm it was following a different Cessna. Spotting Cessna N8669G near the DC-9, the controller then said, "Six nine golf if that's you out there about to turn final pull out to your- ah - well just proceed straight on across the final and enter on a left base leg for runway one seven. You'll be following an Ozark DC-9, turning final about two [miles] out, maybe to your left and above you, you have him?" The Cessna pilot replied, "Six nine golf roger."
A few seconds later at 5:57 p.m., a tower controller called Ozark 965 again with a second traffic advisory, saying "that Cessna off to your right looks like he's eastbound." All three pilots looked to their right and spotted Cessna N8669G directly abeam the DC-9 cockpit. The captain attempted to dodge the small aircraft but heard and felt a thump of impact. The impact and subsequent uncontrolled descent severed the right wing of the Cessna; the main wreckage and left wing were found in an empty parking lot 6,500 ft from the approach end of runway 17. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) characterized the crash as "nonsurvivable". The DC-9 remained controllable and landed on runway 17 without serious incident. It sustained light damage to the right wing and a wing flap, with paint smears consistent with contact with the Cessna's propeller and wing.
Investigation and cause
Investigation
The NTSB initiated an investigation of the accident and issued its final report on June 30, 1969.
There were no published procedures for VFR approaches to Lambert Field; pilots would contact the tower for landing instructions once within 5 mi of the airport, and tower controllers would sequence the aircraft depending on prevailing traffic conditions. Pilots were expected to "see and avoid" conflicting air traffic. The control tower was equipped with radar, but the scope was designed for nighttime lighting conditions, and was not usable in daylight; hence, tower controllers were using binoculars to visually sequence traffic. VFR traffic and tower controller workload was high at the time; controllers were sequencing VFR flights to land on runway 17 from both directions, and a controller was giving rapid radio instructions to multiple flights, including at least two other Cessnas using runway 17, one of which was landing ahead of both accident aircraft.
The NTSB reconstructed the flight paths of both accident aircraft based on FDR and radar data. This confirmed that the Cessna pilots did not follow the flight path dictated by the controller, having apparently either disregarded or failed to understand the instruction to turn right downwind and report, and instead flew directly into the final approach path for runway 17. The controller was initially unaware that the Cessna pilots had done so, as the Cessna pilots were not reporting their position, he lacked radar information, he was busy sequencing other aircraft, and his vantage point made it difficult to accurately judge the Cessna's position visually.
The NTSB performed a visibility study based on the flight paths of both aircraft, concluding that the Cessna should have been visible to the DC-9 first officer (the pilot flying) for 58 seconds leading to the collision; to the aircraft captain, for 22 seconds; and to the observer (the other captain) for 12 seconds, not counting short periods when the windshield framing might have momentarily obscured the small aircraft. Due to the Cessna's high wing configuration, the DC-9 would have been very difficult for the Cessna pilots to see approaching from above and behind; additionally, the Cessna pilots were likely fixated on turning towards the runway or maintaining separation from the other Cessna landing in front of them, and the controller's radio call suggested to the pilots that Ozark 965 would appear above and to their left, not overtake them from behind.
Probable cause
The NTSB determined the probable cause of the accident to be: "the inadequacy of current VFR separation standards in controlled airspace, the crew of the DC-9 not sighting the Cessna in time to avoid it, the absence of VFR traffic pattern procedures to enhance an orderly flow of landing aircraft, the local controller not assuring that important landing information issued to the Cessna was received and understood under the circumstances of a heavy traffic situation without radar assistance, and the Cessna crew's deviation from their traffic pattern instructions or their continuation to a critical point in the traffic pattern without informing the local controller of the progress of the flight."
Text from the Wikipedia article “Ozark Air Lines Flight 965” (revision 1362524178, retrieved 2026-09-18) by its authors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Extracted as plain text: references, tables, images and some sections are left out. Read the article
Sources
Wikipedia article: Ozark Air Lines Flight 965
- Article
- Ozark Air Lines Flight 965
- Revision
- 1362524178 · 2026-07-04 · retrieved 2026-09-18
- Wikidata
- Q115820922
- Licence
- Text CC BY-SA 4.0, by the article's authors; Wikidata CC0; town positions GeoNames (CC BY 4.0)
Where each value comes from
- Record
- Wikipedia article "Ozark Air Lines Flight 965" (page 71497770, revision 1362524178)
- Date
- Wikipedia infobox: date
- Place and country
- Wikipedia infobox: site
- Map position
- Wikipedia article coordinates
- Aircraft, operator and route
- Wikipedia infobox: aircraft type, registration, operator, origin and destination; route airports from the linked airport articles' Wikidata codes (OurAirports)
- Operation
- airline flight number in the infobox
- Fatalities
- Wikipedia infobox: total_fatalities
- Ground fatalities
- not stated in the Wikipedia infobox
- Summary
- Wikipedia infobox: summary
Source notes (1)
- Wikipedia · Facts from the Wikipedia article's infobox and coordinates, not checked against an investigation report. Independent review pending.