FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

ERA25FA228 · Beech 58

14 Jun 2025 · Tabor City, NC, United States

Majesty Air Beech 58 · Accident: loss of control in flight while maneuvering

From Spartanburg Downtown Memorial Airport (SPA) to Grand Strand Airport (CRE)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
ERA25FA228
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Ongoing
API-reported fatalities
2 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
0
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Instrument Meteorological Cond

Beech 58

Aircraft type
Beechcraft 58
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N82UC
Operator
Majesty Air
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Spartanburg Downtown Memorial Airport (SPA), Spartanburg, SCTo Grand Strand Airport (CRE), North Myrtle Beach, SC
Aircraft age
About 53 years (built 1972)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Maneuvering
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Loss of control in flight
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Destroyed

Cause areas

No findings designated as a cause are recorded in the NTSB data yet.

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

On June 14, 2025, at 1245 eastern daylight time, a Beech 58 airplane, N82UC, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Tabor City, North Carolina. The private pilot and passenger were fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The instrument-rated private pilot departed on an instrument flight rules flight from Spartanburg Downtown Memorial Airport/Simpson Field (SPA), Spartanburg, South Carolina at 1120 and was enroute to Grand Strand Airport (CRE), North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, which was located about 170 nautical miles (nm) to the southeast. Preliminary Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) data and air traffic control communications showed that the enroute portion of the flight was normal and unremarkable. The pilot flew a track of about 100°, at an altitude of 7,000 ft mean sea level (msl), and 190 knots groundspeed; during this time the pilot was in communications with the Myrtle Beach (MYR) TRACON controller who issued the airport altimeter setting and queried the pilot if he had the current weather information. The controller instructed the pilot to descend and maintain 4,000 ft msl, which was acknowledged and complied with. The pilot requested a different heading because it looked like they would be heading “straight into” the weather and the controller subsequently issued a heading of 060°. Shortly after, the controller handed the pilot over to the eastern sector radar controller, who approved deviations left and right of course as needed. The pilot arrived in the vicinity of the airport and was preparing for an instrument approach. The controller approved additional deviations to the pilot as needed to avoid heavy precipitation and gave the pilot subsequent headings that would put the airplane on a heading to intercept the final approach course for the ILS approach to runway 23. During this time, light rain was developing over CRE, and heavy precipitation had begun near the departure end of runway 23, along with wind gusts to 25 knots. The controller instructed the pilot to turn right to 140° and descend and maintain 1,700 ft msl. The pilot asked the controller to repeat the instructions which the controller did; the pilot acknowledged. Shortly after, the pilot was cleared for the ILS runway 23 approach and was instructed that in the event of a go-around, to fly heading 090° and maintain 2,000 ft msl, which was acknowledged. As the airplane approached a 1 1/2-mile final, while descending through 800 ft msl, the pilot abandoned the approach and performed a left climbing turn to the north-northeast while climbing to 2,600 ft msl. The controller asked the pilot his intentions and the pilot responded by asking the controller to suggest a heading to get out of the weather and that they wanted to divert to Florence Regional Airport (FLO), Florence, South Carolina, about 55 nm to the west-northwest. The controller provided a heading of 350° and to maintain 3,000 ft msl. About 5 nm miles into the diversion, while at 3,000 ft msl, the pilot turned to a track of about 310° and began a descent; the airplane’s speed increased steadily from 160 knots to about 235 knots groundspeed in a steady straight-line descent. The controller attempted to contact the pilot; however, there was no response. Multiple transmissions were heard that included engine noise and inaudible conversation, but there was no direct pilot-to-controller communication from this point forward. No other communications were received, and radar contact was subsequently lost. The airplane’s descent rate went from -600 feet per minute (fpm) to -4,500 fpm until there was a brief arrest of the descent where it decreased to -300 fpm after which the descent rate increased again to -4,000 fpm until the ADS-B data ended. (Figure 1) During the final descent, there were no observed maneuvers or significant heading changes. The tree impact signatures at the accident site indicated a descent angle of about 23° and were consistent with the airplane being wings level. Figure 1 Final flight path through arrival, approach, diversion and accident. The reported weather conditions at CRE about 5 minutes before the accident included wind from 240° at 20 knots gusting to 30 knots, 1 1/2-mile visibility with heavy thunderstorms, rain, and mist. There were few clouds at 1,000 ft above ground level (agl) and scattered clouds at 2,100 ft agl. The reported temperature and dewpoint were 27° and 26° C, respectively. At 1244, about the time of the accident, the reported wind was from 240° at 14 knots gusting to 27 knots, 3/4 mile visibility, heavy thunderstorms, rain and mist, few clouds at 800 ft, broken clouds at 1,800 ft and 5,000 ft agl and the reported temperature and dewpoint were 27° and 26° C, respectively.

Figure 2 Overview of final route of flight with flight track and weather.

The airplane impacted a remote and densely wooded area covered with 75 ft-tall mature pine trees at an elevation of 40 ft. The wreckage path was 468 ft-long and oriented on a magnetic heading of 293° and scattered in a tight formation throughout the entire path. The initial impact area was the tops of 75-ft-tall trees with associated tree and limb fractures progressively lower to the terrain; about 30 trees were damaged by the impact. The airplane wreckage was extremely fragmented. All flight control surfaces, wings, empennage, cockpit, and engine assemblies were impact-separated and strewn throughout the accident site. The largest item discovered at the accident site was a portion of the aft right fuselage that contained an entry step and door. There was no fire. The accident site had the slight odor of aviation fuel and fuel blight was observed on the surrounding vegetation. A majority of flight control surfaces and major components were identified and accounted for at the accident site, although all were severely fragmented and damaged. Flight control continuity could not be confirmed on site due to the severity of the damage; however, all control cables that were observed exhibited features consistent with tensile overload and a “broom straw” appearance. No indications of flight control anomalies were discovered during the accident site examination. Flight control trim settings were inconclusive. Both propeller assemblies separated from the engines and exhibited features consistent with impact and rotational damage. Both propellers showed signs of s-bends, chordwise scraping, leading edge gouges and trailing surface waves. Both engines separated from their respective firewall and were impact-damaged and discovered in close proximity to each other. Both engines showed significant impact damage. Two data cards were discovered in different locations at the accident site. The Garmin G1000 unit, which was severely damaged, was missing its data cards from their respective slots. The recovered cards were retained for examination and download. The wreckage was retained for further investigation.

Verbatim NTSB factual narrative from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record ERA25FA228
Event ID
20250614200322
Case number
ERA25FA228
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: fb902de6c6968971caa7cc8f70e51e661716364819ce06e685a005e791f10e49; retrieved 2026-09-15T09:05:38.240Z.