FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

ERA25LA007 · North American NAVION

3 Oct 2024 · Rutherfordton, NC, United States

North American NAVION · Accident: fire/smoke (non-impact) on approach

From Concord-Padgett Regional Airport (JQF) to an unrecorded destination

Report a problem

Narrative check · The NTSB narrative appears to contradict this record's damage. Values are shown as recorded, not corrected; compare with the narrative.

Event

NTSB case
ERA25LA007
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
0 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
0
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

North American NAVION

Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N9117R
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Concord-Padgett Regional Airport (JQF), Concord, NCTo not recorded
Aircraft age
About 75 years (built 1949)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Approach · VFR pattern final
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Fire/smoke (non-impact)
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial Possible conflict

Cause areas

  • Not determined › Not determined

Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

About 36 minutes after departure and while on final approach to land, the pilot heard a loud “pop” and felt heat emanating from an area behind the pilot and copilot’s seats. As the airplane approached the runway threshold, smoke accumulated in the cabin and visible flame developed. During the landing, the airplane’s nose landing gear collapsed, and the airplane came to rest on the runway. The in-flight and postaccident fire consumed a majority of the airplane. Postaccident examination revealed that the fuel selector was positioned to the auxiliary fuel tank. The right main fuel tank’s vent line was found attached, but its two hose clamps were not secured. A loose Bnut was also observed on a highpressure hydraulic hose located at the controllable relief valve in the engine compartment. The majority of the fuel supply, vapor return, and vent lines were destroyed by fire. According to the airplane flight and service manuals, when the main tanks were full, use of the auxiliary fuel tank could result in vapor return fuel being expelled overboard through the main tank vent system until at least 1 hour of flight had been completed or 10 gallons of fuel had been consumed. A preaccident photograph showed the vent outlet located approximately 10 inches aft of, and generally aligned with, the left exhaust extension. The pilot reported departing with the fuel selector positioned to the auxiliary fuel tank and making no subsequent changes. Although overboard fuel expulsion from the main fuel tank vent line was the most likely source of fuel for the fire, hydraulic fluid from the loose B-nut could not be ruled out. Thermal exposure and wreckage movement likely contributed to the loose hydraulic fitting, making it a less likely fuel source; however, due to thermal damage the source of the fire could not be determined with confidence.

Probable cause

An in-flight fire, the origin of which could not be determined based on the available evidence.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record ERA25LA007
Event ID
20241013195303
Case number
ERA25LA007
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 3ff23f771180b6bfcf4203d66f5a3bcbb18730b2c8a8e2d7703101b8edfb914c; retrieved 2026-09-16T19:22:27.490Z.