CEN24LA356 · Piper PA-12
Wings Aircraft Piper PA-12 · Accident: fuel related en route
From John F Kennedy Memorial Airport (ASX) to Cumberland Municipal Airport (UBE)
Event
- NTSB case
- CEN24LA356
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Ongoing
- Event fatalities
- Unknown
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Piper PA-12
- Aircraft type
- Piper PA-12
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N7878M
- Operator
- Wings Aircraft
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From John F Kennedy Memorial Airport (ASX), Ashland, WITo Cumberland Municipal Airport (UBE), Cumberland, WI
- Aircraft age
- Not recorded
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- En route · descent
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Fuel related
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
No findings designated as a cause are recorded in the NTSB data yet.
Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
On September 12, 2024, about 1205 central daylight time, a Piper PA-12 airplane, N7878M, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Cumberland, Wisconsin. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.
The pilot reported that the airplane was established in cruise flight at 2,100 ft mean sea level with the throttle set at about 2,300 rpm and the mixture leaned to rich-of-peak when he entered a descent toward Cumberland Municipal Airport (CBE), Cumberland, Wisconsin. The pilot stated that he did not make any throttle or mixture control changes when he began his descent, and that the engine was using fuel from both wing fuel tanks.
The pilot reported that about 5 miles from CBE, while in cruise descent, the engine began to sputter and then suddenly lost power. He moved the throttle to full-forward and increased the mixture to full-rich, and the engine briefly resumed operation for 5-10 seconds before it quit running a second time.
The pilot reported the airplane was at sufficiently low altitude which required an immediate forced landing in a nearby cornfield. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the engine mounts, fuselage structure, and right wing.
Examination of the airplane fuel system and the engine revealed no evidence of a preimpact mechanical malfunction. The was ample fuel recovered from the fuel tanks at the accident site, and there was no evidence of any water or particulate contamination of the fuel system.
Internal engine and valve train continuity were confirmed as the crankshaft was rotated through the propeller flange. Compression and suction were noted on all four cylinders in conjunction with crankshaft rotation. A lighted borescope inspection of each cylinder did not reveal any anomalies with the cylinders, pistons, valves, valve seats. Both magnetos remained attached to their engine installation points and produced spark at each ignition lead. The upper spark plugs exhibited features consistent with normal engine operation. The engine oil sump contained ample oil, and the disassembled oil filter did not reveal any evidence of contamination. The carburetor fuel inlet screen exhibited no evidence of contamination.
The throttle cable was broken at the clevis, but the carburetor throttle position remained in a wide-open position. The mixture control was found in the full-rich position, and the full-rich mechanical stop-pin was found fractured.
The cockpit carburetor heat control was found turned off. Cable continuity was confirmed from the carburetor heat control to the airbox control; however, due to impact-related damage to the airbox, the carburetor heat valve could not move. A borescope was inserted into the damaged airbox and did not reveal any evidence of rubbing/scratching between the carburetor heat valve and the airbox.
According to a carburetor icing probability chart contained in Federal Aviation Administration Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin CE-09-35, Carburetor Icing Prevention, the recorded temperature and dew point at the time of the accident were in the range of susceptibility for the formation of serious carburetor icing at glide engine power. According to the bulletin, if ice forms in the carburetor of a fixed-pitch propeller aircraft, the restriction to the induction airflow will result in decreased power output and a drop in engine rpm, which might be accompanied or followed by a rough running engine. The bulletin also notes that a pilot should respond to carburetor icing by applying full carburetor heat immediately and that the engine may run rough initially for a short time while the ice melts. The bulletin further recommends that a pilot use carburetor heat when operating the engine at low power settings or while in weather conditions in which carburetor icing is probable.
During a follow-up interview, the pilot acknowledged that he did not review a carburetor icing chart before the flight, but he then stated that he applied carburetor heat after the engine began sputtering.
Verbatim NTSB factual narrative from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record CEN24LA356
- Event ID
- 20240913195116
- Case number
- CEN24LA356
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 92761f4e83c747d3178e87815a161e747109df5d7590218443e9aa7287e02c53; retrieved 2026-09-16T19:16:03.663Z.