FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

ANC24FA008 · Piper PA-18-150

8 Dec 2023 · Anchor Point, AK, United States

Piper PA-18-150 · Accident en route

From King Salmon, AK to Homer Airport (HOM)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
ANC24FA008
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
2 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Piper PA-18-150

Aircraft type
Piper PA-18
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N1880P
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From King Salmon, AKTo Homer Airport (HOM), Homer, AK
Aircraft age
About 68 years (built 1955)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
En route
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Unknown or undetermined
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Destroyed

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The pilot was conducting a cross-country personal flight with one passenger. After takeoff, the airplane climbed to altitude to overfly a large body of water. After crossing over the body of water the airplane began a descent. Subsequently, a vehicle dash-mounted camera captured about 7 seconds of video of the airplane falling vertically in an inverted flat spin with the left wing’s outboard section partially separated from the airplane, folded in a V-shape, before impact. The recorded video did not capture the initiating event. Review of flight track data from the airplane’s GPS indicated the pilot initiated a descent of about 1,000 ft per minute (fpm) as the airplane neared the shoreline. The descent rate remained steady until the airplane crossed over the shoreline at an altitude of about 4,500 ft mean sea level (msl), when the descent rate increased to about 4,000 fpm. The airplane came to rest in low brush and trees in an inverted attitude. All major airframe and engine components were recovered at the impact site. Control continuity was established between the cockpit flight controls and their respective control surfaces. Examination of the engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the left wing revealed a portion of the leading edge skin was flattened and fractured into two pieces. There was mechanical tearing on the upper portion of the aluminum leading edge skin and the leading edge ribs were crushed against the forward spar in this area. The fabric skin covering the aluminum leading edge skin in this area was torn and ripped, coincident with the mechanical damage. Multiple linear, parallel gouges, cuts, and scuffs were oriented aft and inboard in the wing fabric around the area that was torn. There was no evidence of transferred material in these marks, and no evidence of tree debris around the leading edge damage. The mechanical damage to the left wing’s leading edge and the linear, parallel witness marks were consistent with impact by an object. The examined fracture surfaces had an angled, dull, grainy appearance consistent with overstress separation. The left wing had no obvious corrosion, and it was assembled correctly and was intact before the initiating event, with no pre-existing conditions that would compromise its strength. The deformation of the left wing’s leading edge and spars and the fracture of the left wing spars were not consistent with normal in-flight loads. The separation of the propeller tip from overstress was consistent with impact separation while under power. Based on physical evidence, it is likely that the leading edge of the left wing was impacted, at an undetermined time, which deformed the forward and aft spars and fractured the forward spar. Aerodynamic loads then twisted the left wing’s outboard section leading edge down and fractured the rear spar, partially separating the left wing from the fuselage. The left wing’s outboard section remained attached to the lift struts, and aerodynamic loads deformed it into a V-shape about the strut attach points. The location and orientation of silver paint transfer marks indicate the upper surface of the left wing’s outboard section likely impacted the airplane’s left ski as the wing fractured and partially separated. This sequence rendered the airplane uncontrollable and resulted in it entering an inverted flat spin. Examination of the wing showed impact signatures consistent with a glancing impact, but the timing of the contact could not be determined. Based on the available evidence, investigators could not establish whether the damage occurred on the ground, in flight, or immediately before the accident. If a second aircraft had contacted the accident airplane, it is possible that the damage would have been minor enough for continued flight and a normal landing. However, aside from an unverified radio transmission or phone call, the investigation found no evidence that another aircraft was near the accident airplane at the time of the event.

Probable cause

An impact to the left wing, at an undetermined time, for reasons that could not be determined, which partially separated the left wing and rendered the airplane uncontrollable.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record ANC24FA008
Event ID
20231209193500
Case number
ANC24FA008
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 341e66ec5d541f0c9c7bc41c21aabac5707f301e1718f1ccb970c90b3b6bec3d; retrieved 2026-09-15T08:09:06.896Z.