Air Evac EMS Bell 206 L3 accident
Bell 206 L3 · Accident: collision during takeoff/landing
From Fort Madison, IA to an unrecorded destination
Event
- NTSB case
- CEN23LA350
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- API-reported fatalities
- 0 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- 0
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- Charter & commuter
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Bell 206 L3
- Aircraft type
- Bell 206
- Category
- Helicopter
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N288AE
- Operator
- Air Evac EMS
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Fort Madison, IATo not recorded
- Aircraft age
- About 34 years (built 1989)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- Landing
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Collision during takeoff/landing
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena
- Environmental issues › Physical environment
- Personnel issues › Action/decision
- Personnel issues › Psychological
Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
The air medical helicopter was dispatched to a remote area to pick up a patient in night visual meteorological conditions. While enroute, the aircrew received received a landing zone (LZ) brief that included information that a wire fence was located on the south side of the road. Upon approach to the LZ, the pilot and the flight nurse transitioned to and used night vision goggles (NVGs). The pilot performed both high and low reconnaissance and the aircrew verified that there were no poles or wires present. The flight nurse reported that she observed the fence on the south side of the road during this time; however, she thought the fence was farther away than it was. The pilot maneuvered the helicopter to a 10-ft hover over the road; the aircrew identified the wire fence on the south side of the road and noted that there were ditches on both sides of the road. The pilot initiated a right pedal turn and he planned to land so that the cabin door was oriented toward the accident scene. As the helicopter touched down, the pilot heard a “pop” noise and he felt feedback in the tail rotor pedals. The pilot realized the tail rotor system impacted the wire fence; he lowered the collective immediately and performed an emergency shutdown. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to the vertical stabilizer, the tail boom, the tail rotor driveshaft, and the two tail rotor blades. At the time of the accident, the moon was bright with 73% of its disk illuminated and it was at a relative angle of 25° above the horizon. According to NVG training references, terrain interpretation is generally more difficult when the moon is low on the horizon due to the lower light level and the shadows caused by the low angle. is the pilot likely had difficulty viewing the fence while using NVGs due to the lower light level and the presence of shadows. It is likely that, during the landing, the aircrew misjudged the distance of the wire fence due to the reduced distance estimation and depth perception while using NVGs.
Probable cause
A collision with a fence during landing due to the crew’s reduced distance estimation and depth perception while using night vision goggles. Contributing to the accident was the low moon angle, which made viewing the fence more challenging.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record CEN23LA350
- Event ID
- 20230807192809
- Case number
- CEN23LA350
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: e244308fd90a27ff12e82ac12e104b6f724dbd203296f1ff029fdd201fade24b; retrieved 2026-09-16T17:58:08.400Z.