FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

WPR23LA241 · Cessna 172K

23 Jun 2023 · Marana, AZ, United States

Cessna 172K · Accident: fuel exhaustion en route

From Inyokern Airport (IYK) to Ryan Field (RYN)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
WPR23LA241
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
Event fatalities
Unknown
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Cessna 172K

Aircraft type
Cessna 172
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N84385
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Inyokern Airport (IYK), Inyokern, CATo Ryan Field (RYN), Tucson, AZ
Aircraft age
About 54 years (built 1969)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
En route · cruise
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Fuel exhaustion
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Fluids/miscellaneous hardware
  • Personnel issues › Psychological
  • Personnel issues › Task performance

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The pilot departed on the cross-country flight with an estimated 38 gallons of fuel onboard. While enroute, the pilot deviated from the direct route to his destination, which increased his enroute time and distance. Flight track data revealed that the airplane arrived near the planned fuel stop, but the pilot stated that he diverted to another airport when he could not activate the runway lights at his intended fuel stop. After travelling for about 3 hours, 46 minutes, a total of about 467 miles, and about 5 miles short of the airport intended to be his second fuel stop, the engine lost total power about the time that the pilot stated that the fuel quantity gauges had “dropped all the way to basically nothing.” The pilot reported that there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation but suspected that the airplane may have developed a fuel leak. Postaccident examination revealed no evidence of a fuel leak. Based on the available information, it is likely that the loss of power was the result of fuel exhaustion. The Owner’s Manual Cruise and Range Performance Chart revealed that with 38 gallons of fuel, the accident flight’s distance and time enroute were within the chart limits; however, the accident flight consisted mostly of low altitude maneuvering flight that were not addressed by the Owner’s Manual. Field sobriety testing of the pilot was conducted at the scene of the accident, with no determination of impairment being made by law enforcement at that time. Toxicological testing of the pilot’s blood indicated that the pilot likely had used a cannabis product, cocaine, amphetamine, and MDMA. Although his use of these controlled substances conveyed significant risk of impairment, available evidence was insufficient to determine the precise timing of his substance use, specific impairing effects during the accident flight, or whether such effects contributed to the accident.

Probable cause

A total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record WPR23LA241
Event ID
20230626192461
Case number
WPR23LA241
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 80e5fc5b2d60d7c7e5103cfcd9754c45c9601b7cefe12f5dd5bcb5edcb4b5b3d; retrieved 2026-09-16T17:46:33.524Z.