FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

CEN23LA178 · Airbus Helicopters EC130 T2

6 May 2023 · Carta Valley, TX, United States

Airbus Helicopters EC130 T2 · Accident: cabin safety event while maneuvering

From Mafrige Ranch Inc Airport (2TA9) to an unrecorded destination

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
CEN23LA178
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
0 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
0
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Airbus Helicopters EC130 T2

Aircraft type
Airbus EC130
Category
Helicopter
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N254DM
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Mafrige Ranch Inc Airport (2TA9), Carta Valley, TXTo not recorded
Aircraft age
About 1 year (built 2022)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Maneuvering · hover
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Cabin safety event
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
None

Cause areas

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision
  • Personnel issues › Physical
  • Personnel issues › Psychological
  • Personnel issues › Task performance

Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The helicopter departed for a low-level flight to perform aerial hunting of wild pigs on a remote ranch. During the flight, several herds of wild pigs were located and were engaged by the two rear-seat passengers. Shortly after, the pilot brought the helicopter to an out-of-ground effect hover, about 50 ft above ground level (agl), and assessed that the helicopter needed to be refueled. The helicopter was slowly moving forward during the hover when the left rear-seat passenger observed, from the “corner of his eye” as he was turning his head, the right rear-seat passenger depart the helicopter. Just before departing the helicopter, the right rear-seat passenger was facing forward. He then turned his body about 90° to the right facing out of the helicopter, he stepped on the pedestal mounted on the right skid, stood up, and then took a step forward. The left rear-seat passenger notified the pilot about what he observed, and the pilot landed the helicopter. The injured passenger was unconscious with serious injuries. The injured passenger was loaded onto the helicopter, both cabin doors were closed, and the helicopter departed. The passenger was transported for medical treatment. The helicopter was not damaged. The passenger did not provide a statement to the NTSB. The helicopter owner reported that while in the out-of-ground effect hover, the passenger may have thought the helicopter was near the ground when he decided to depart the helicopter. The helicopter owner also reported that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airframe or the engine that would have precluded normal operation. Postaccident examination of the right rear passenger seat and restraint system did not reveal any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Postaccident download of the accident flight engine data showed normal engine performance. Toxicological evidence indicates that the injured passenger had consumed alcohol before the accident. Hospital testing measured a serum ethanol level of 0.067 g/dL about 2.6 hours after the accident. During the flight, the injured passenger was quiet, did not do or say anything abnormal, and did not appear to have been intoxicated. Based on this evidence, the injured passenger was likely experiencing impairing ethanol effects at the time of the accident. Such effects likely included worsened perception, judgment, and/or coordination that increased the likelihood of an accident. Thus, the injured passenger’s alcohol impairment likely contributed to his improper judgment to release his restraint system and depart the helicopter while in a hover.

Probable cause

The right rear-seat passenger’s improper judgement to release his restraint system and depart the helicopter while in a hover, which resulted in him sustaining serious injuries. Contributing to the accident was his impairment from effects of alcohol consumption.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record CEN23LA178
Event ID
20230509122569
Case number
CEN23LA178
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, cause areas, damage. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 72ff4e7c829afdc9949ee6700f0408e3e35086d1976e8ab33b58e1ba5f0fe32d; retrieved 2026-09-16T17:35:04.379Z.