FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

WPR23FA172 · Cessna 172S

29 Apr 2023 · Los Angeles, CA, United States

Cessna 172S · Accident: controlled flight into terrain/object (CFIT) on approach

From Bermuda Dunes Airport (UDD) to Van Nuys Airport (VNY)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
WPR23FA172
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
1 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Unknown

Cessna 172S

Aircraft type
Cessna 172
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N575ND
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Bermuda Dunes Airport (UDD), Palm Springs, CATo Van Nuys Airport (VNY), Van Nuys, CA
Aircraft age
About 14 years (built 2009)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Approach
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Controlled flight into terrain/object (CFIT)
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment
  • Personnel issues › Psychological

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, not marked as estimated; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The non-instrument-rated private pilot rented the airplane from a flight school, where he had just completed a flight review two days before the accident. The flight was for pleasure, with the pilot planning to have lunch in the area and return later in the day. Marine layer weather conditions consisting of low visibilities and low ceiling had been forecast and were being reported at his destination and in the area of the accident around the time the airplane took off from the departure airport for the return flight. Phone records indicate that the pilot checked the weather about the time of departure and would have been aware that his destination airport was already reporting instrument meteorological conditions, and that he would not have been able to land there. Nevertheless, he continued with the departure, taking off about 50 minutes before sunset. All inland airports along the pilot’s route of flight were reporting VFR weather conditions.

For the first segment of the flight the airplane flew along a reciprocal route to the outbound journey. The pilot then began a gradual descent, likely in preparation for landing. About an hour after takeoff, the flight reached the congested airspace at the southeastern edge of the Burbank Airport (BUR) Class C airspace and the border of the LAX Class B airspace. By now the sun had set, and the area to the pilot’s left (south) was completely enveloped in clouds. Clouds were likely also intermittently obscuring the surrounding terrain, lighting, and ground features as the marine layer progressed. However, Van Nuys Airport, just 10 miles northwest, was reporting clear skies and unlimited visibility.

After descending to about 1,000 ft agl over the Hollywood Hills, the pilot initiated contact with the Van Nuys control tower. He was provided a transponder code and began a series of communications with the tower controller, who gave him instructions to turn toward a highway interchange reference point just south of the airport. He did not appear to understand the reference, so the controller provided him with a northwest heading and the airplane began to turn northwest, toward the airport, while descending.

The airplane continued to descend with no further communication from the pilot; a short time later it struck the top of a hilly peak, about 8 miles short of the landing runway. The debris field direction, length, and pattern indicated the airplane was flying straight and level, at a high speed; the airplane impacted in a manner consistent with controlled flight into terrain.

During the final segment of the flight the airplane descended so low that it is likely the pilot could no longer distinguish between the lights of the hillside residences and the lights in the valley beyond and ahead where the airport was located. Compounding the visual illusion would have been the rising terrain beyond the airport, the low clouds that were forming in the area, the decreasing light levels, and the fact that the area the airplane struck was unlit and probably not visible to him. He was therefore likely experiencing a visual illusion as he flew toward the airport and lost situational awareness. The weather then deteriorated so rapidly that it hampered the search efforts, even though it was in a densely populated area.

The pilot had relatively low time, and did not hold an instrument rating. He learned to fly in another city, and although he had flown in the Los Angeles area about half a dozen times before, those journeys were during daylight hours and avoided most of the congested airspace close to the accident area. It is therefore likely that he was task saturated as he approached the airport through unfamiliar and busy terrain and airspace, and his communication with the control tower appeared to indicate he was slightly confused.

Examination of the airframe and engine did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation, and damage signatures indicated the engine was producing power at impact.

The pilot had Type I diabetes mellitus and was using insulin. However, his diabetes was well managed with medication and was therefore not a factor in the accident.

Probable cause

The pilot’s failure to maintain clearance with the hilly terrain resulting from his loss of situational awareness due to the deteriorating weather conditions as he descended to approach his destination airport.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record WPR23FA172
Event ID
20230430107167
Case number
WPR23FA172
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: local date, investigation status, coordinates, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date; the NTSB stores the UTC date 2023-04-30.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: ec9901ebc747077641c47af1cb50d60d42048a82e5ca6dfb6860588b47d3cd22; retrieved 2026-09-15T07:59:12.997Z.