ERA23LA124 · Canton Paul A RV-6
Canton Paul A RV-6 · Accident: fuel starvation during initial climb
From an unrecorded airport to Skypark Estates Owners Assoc Airport (18FD)
Event
- NTSB case
- ERA23LA124
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- API-reported fatalities
- 0 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- 0
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Canton Paul A RV-6
- Aircraft type
- Canton Paul RV-6
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N330PC
- Operator
- Unknown
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From not recordedTo Skypark Estates Owners Assoc Airport (18FD), Baker, FL
- Aircraft age
- About 25 years (built 1998)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- Initial climb
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Fuel starvation
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems
- Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge
- Personnel issues › Task performance
Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
After having a condition inspection of the experimental amateur-built airplane completed, the pilot reported performing a thorough preflight inspection, checking both fuel tanks for contamination with none noted. The left wing fuel tank contained about 7 gallons of 100LL aviation fuel and the right wing fuel tank was almost full. The preflight inspection, engine start, and run-up were normal. During initial climb, the engine sustained a total loss of power. The pilot pushed the nose over and attempted a left turn to return to the airport. The engine regained power shortly before the airplane impacted the ground and a fuel truck, resulting in substantial damage. Postaccident examination of the engine found no evidence of a preimpact mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the wing fuel tanks revealed that the fuel pickups in both wing fuel tanks were installed incorrectly as compared to the kit manufacturer’s plans; both lines were facing forward instead of aft. The incorrect positioning of the pickup lines made it likely that the amount of unusable fuel was greatly increased, especially at nose high pitch attitudes, such as during takeoff and initial climb, due to the fuel’s movement toward the aft portion of the tank. The pilot reported that he was not provided documentation when he bought the airplane as to the quantity of unusable fuel, nor had the unusable fuel amounts been calculated since he purchased the airplane. A review of maintenance records showed that the kit manufacturer’s service bulletin and a service notification letter relating to fuel pickups had not been complied with. While compliance was not mandatory, if the service bulletin and service letter had been complied with, it is possible that the incorrect fuel pickup orientation would have been identified. Although the amount of unusable fuel in the selected tank selected could not be determined (given the damage sustained to the tank during the accident), it is likely that during initial climb the engine was starved for fuel due to the incorrect installation of the pickup lines, resulting in a loss of engine power.
Probable cause
The incorrect installation of the fuel pickups, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. Contributing was the lack of documentation of the airplane’s unusable fuel.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record ERA23LA124
- Event ID
- 20230207106687
- Case number
- ERA23LA124
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 1b094501c7450acc3dc9d8349e935fc43a9ebdaefe264c16ced22119b4643c46; retrieved 2026-09-16T17:18:54.846Z.