ERA20LA207 · Quad City CHALLENGER II
Quad City CHALLENGER II · Accident: loss of control in flight during initial climb
From Wurtsboro-Sullivan County Airport (N82) to an unrecorded destination
Event
- NTSB case
- ERA20LA207
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- API-reported fatalities
- 2 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- 0
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Quad City CHALLENGER II
- Aircraft type
- Quad City CHALLENGER
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N850RW
- Operator
- Unknown
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Wurtsboro-Sullivan County Airport (N82), Wurtsboro, NYTo not recorded
- Aircraft age
- About 8 years (built 2012)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- Initial climb
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Loss of control in flight
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
- Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability
- Personnel issues › Action/decision
Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
According to a witness, the airplane was tail heavy, so the pilot/owner and student pilot had added ballast to the front of the airplane and performed several high-speed taxi runs before departing for a test flight. After liftoff, the airplane began to yaw left and continued a left turn. The airplane did not climb and remained just above the treetops. The witness further reported that it sounded as though the pilot reduced engine power just before he lost sight of the airplane over the trees then heard the impact. The damage to trees and to the airplane was consistent with a low-energy impact. Examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. There were three canvas bags of sand ballast located in the forward section of the airplane that, when full, would have weighed about 22 lbs each. One of the ballast bags was wrapped around the bottom of the left rudder pedal and significantly torn, with about 5 lbs of sand remaining in the bag. There was a small amount of sand nearby, but not enough to total 22 lbs. The heavily torn ballast bag wrapped around the left rudder pedal and lack of residual sand nearby suggested that the base of the left rudder pedal likely got stuck on the left ballast bag at some point during the short flight, interfering with the flight controls and resulting in the left yaw and turn. The sand that escaped the torn left bag was likely scattered during the impact sequence, leaving very little sand near the left ballast bag when the airplane came to rest. Weight and balance calculations revealed that the airplane was 127 lbs over the maximum gross weight of 800 lbs, of which about 66 lbs was ballast. Given this information, it is likely that the pilot’s improper use of ballast weight resulted in further exceedance of the airplane’s maximum gross weight and that the placement of the ballast resulted in an interference with the rudder controls. It is likely that these two factors limited the airplane’s controllability and ability to climb, and directly contributed to the loss of control during takeoff and subsequent impact with terrain.
Probable cause
A loss of control after takeoff due to the pilot’s improper use of ballast weight. Contributing was the pilot’s decision to operate the airplane above its maximum gross weight.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record ERA20LA207
- Event ID
- 20200605X25035
- Case number
- ERA20LA207
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 89a3794c8d791ee662e5aac05057c2785dc11ac561db30ef8496405920440ef7; retrieved 2026-09-15T07:15:44.245Z.