FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

ANC17FA018 · Cessna R172K K

5 Mar 2017 · Nome, AK, United States

Cessna R172K K · Accident: fuel exhaustion en route

From Wasilla Airport (IYS) to Nome City Field (94Z)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
ANC17FA018
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
1 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Instrument Meteorological Cond

Cessna R172K K

Aircraft type
Cessna 172
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N736AS
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Wasilla Airport (IYS), Wasilla, AKTo Nome City Field (94Z), Nome, AK
Aircraft age
About 40 years (built 1977)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
En route · cruise
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Fuel exhaustion
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability
  • Aircraft › Fluids/miscellaneous hardware
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision
  • Personnel issues › Task performance

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The private pilot was conducting a cross-county flight from Wasilla to Nome, Alaska, at night. According to GPS data, the airplane departed at 1710 and crashed at 2223. The pilot's third-class medical certificate had the limitation "not valid for night flying," but meteorological information for Nome indicated that the end of civil twilight occurred at 2022. Thus, the pilot's operation of the flight after 2022 was not in compliance with his medical certification. The pilot was also not in compliance with the requirement in Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations 91.409(a) for airplanes operating under Part 91 to have annual inspections.

The pilot dispensed 35 gallons of fuel into the airplane and fuel containers before the flight. The fuel quantity in the fuel tanks before the flight is unknown. According to the airplane manufacturer's performance charts, if the airplane was filled to the maximum capacity of 52 gallons, it would have had a no-wind range of 505 to 545 nm with 5 gallons of reserve fuel, depending on the engine and propeller settings. The GPS data indicated that the airplane flew a total distance of 518 nm from the taxi to the accident time, which was above the minimum range.

The destination weather forecast product that was available before the flight indicated ceilings as low as 1,500 ft and visibility 4 miles in light snow and mist. The updated forecast that was published during the flight and was valid at the time of the accident indicated a ceiling of 500 ft and visibility of 1 ½ miles. No evidence indicated that the pilot obtained weather forecast information before or during the flight. About 45 minutes before the pilot's expected arrival, a friend at the destination told the pilot that the ceiling was 600 ft in fog, which was below visual flight rules weather. The pilot's text messages revealed that he would continue to the destination because he thought that he could "sneak in." However, the pilot did not have an instrument rating.

Witness statements and an automated weather recording revealed a low ceiling in fog at the time that the airplane arrived in the terminal area. The pilot attempted to land four times but was unable to see the unlit runway through the fog, so the pilot departed the terminal area. A larger, plowed, and well-lit airport was 1 mile away and would have been an appropriate destination for a night flight in a wheel-equipped airplane. Although the specific reasons why the pilot was determined to land at the small, dark, snow-covered destination airport are not known, it is possible that the pilot wanted to avoid detection because of the packaged marijuana that was found in the airplane wreckage.

GPS data indicated that, 8 minutes after departing the terminal area, the airplane slowed to a groundspeed of 35 knots (well below the 54-knot stall speed) at an altitude of 373 ft, and the airplane crashed about 1 minute later. An examination of the wreckage revealed that the airplane impacted sea ice in a nose-down spin, resulting in extensive wing leading edge crush damage, which was consistent with an aerodynamic stall at a low altitude and a loss of control.

The fuel tanks had no quantifiable fuel, and the propeller blades lacked chordwise scratches or torsional deformation, which were consistent with an impact due to a loss of engine power after fuel exhaustion. A forced emergency landing on the sea ice would have been possible had the pilot maintained glide speed after the loss of engine power. Also, a suitable airport with good weather conditions was located 60 nm northeast of the destination. Had the pilot elected to divert to that airport before attempting visual approaches in instrument meteorological conditions, the airplane might have had enough fuel to land at that airport.

Probable cause

The pilot's improper decision to conduct multiple visual approaches to the destination airport despite the night instrument meteorological conditions; the airplane's low fuel state at that time, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion; and the pilot's subsequent failure to maintain adequate airspeed, which led to an aerodynamic stall and a loss of control. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's operation of the flight with a medical certification limitation that precluded him from night flying.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record ANC17FA018
Event ID
20170306X60913
Case number
ANC17FA018
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: local date, investigation status, coordinates. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date; the NTSB stores the UTC date 2017-03-06.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 30edb778f08b277e7b3bea40febeeefd1c5a64742fe2c343a668313f84982884; retrieved 2026-09-15T05:59:27.977Z.