FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

CHI07LA168 · Cessna R172K

13 Jun 2007 · Lakewood, WI, United States

Cessna R172K · Accident: other gear collapsed during takeoff

From Lakewood Airpark (4WN3) to an unrecorded destination

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
CHI07LA168
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
0 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Cessna R172K

Aircraft type
Cessna 172
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N736MV
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Lakewood Airpark (4WN3), Lakewood, WITo not recorded
Aircraft age
Not recorded
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Takeoff · roll/run
First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Other gear collapsed
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Landing gear, main gear strut › Fractured
  • Landing gear, main gear strut › Overload
  • Landing gear, nose gear strut › Separation
  • Manufacturer › Acft/equip, inadequate design

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The pilot reported that the right nose wheel separated from the float approximately 210 feet from where the airplane started the takeoff roll, and about 35 feet later, the left nose wheel separated from the float. After the left nose wheel separated, the left nose wheel strut dug into the turf causing the aircraft to nose over. The inspection of the airplane revealed that the nose wheel struts had separated from the castoring assemblies. The left and right nose wheel struts and castoring assemblies were sent to the National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) Materials Laboratory for a metallurgical examination. The visual examination of the parts showed that the castoring nose wheels from both floats had fractured at the bearing boss welds to the strut arms. Both strut arms were bent upward. The right arm was bent about 30 degrees and the left was bent about 5 degrees. The strut fractures were located through the fusion zones of the strut to bearing boss welds with some tearing of the boss material at the upper edges of the welds. Microscopic inspection of the fractures on both struts revealed matte gray textured fracture surfaces typical of overstress fractures. Deformation and rearward displacement of the boss material adjacent to the upper edge tears and fracture regions, along with the smearing contact of the lower fracture areas, were consistent with bending overstress forces on the weld joint. On August 8, 2007, Baumann Floats LLC issued Service Bulletin No. 001. The reason for the issuance of the service bulletin was "to improve the service and reliability of the nose gear assembly." The service bulletin modified the G-129 nose gear tube assembly. Compliance with the service bulletin was considered mandatory by the manufacturer upon receipt of the service bulletin, and specifically prior to operating off grass or soft field areas.

Probable cause

The amphibian nose wheel strut assembly separated due to an overload fracture as a result of the manufacturer's inadequate design.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record CHI07LA168
Event ID
20070614X00730
Case number
CHI07LA168
Dataset
historical-pre2008
Source SHA-256
89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: b1e92fa353bd9f780914f060240b9a143d50121eb9ba35d554bddc5647f5cea8; retrieved 2026-09-21T18:29:38.937Z.