FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

LAX00FA101 · Cessna 172N

15 Feb 2000 · Palm Springs, CA, United States

Bermuda Dunes Air Service Cessna 172N and Alliance International Aviation Piper PA-28-140 · Accident: midair collision on approach

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
LAX00FA101
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
0 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
0
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Aircraft 1 · Cessna 172N

Aircraft type
Cessna 172
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N6479D
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Palm Springs International Airport (PSP), Palm Springs, CATo Bermuda Dunes Airport (UDD), Bermuda Dunes, CA
Aircraft age
Not recorded
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Approach · VFR pattern downwind
First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Midair collision
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Aircraft 2 · Piper PA-28-140

Aircraft type
Piper PA-28
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N84PB
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Chino Airport (CNO), Chino, CATo Palm Springs International Airport (PSP)
Aircraft age
Not recorded
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Approach · VFR pattern downwind
First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Midair collision
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Minor

Cause areas

  • Flightcrew of other aircraft › Visual separation, not maintained
  • Flightcrew › Visual separation, not maintained

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

A high-wing airplane and low-wing airplane collided in mid-air while operating in the traffic pattern at a controlled airport. The air traffic controller issued traffic advisories to both aircraft, and each pilot acknowledged the advisories. The controller also requested that the low-wing airplane, which was inbound to the airport, to "report two miles out on the forty five." The pilot of the low-wing airplane acknowledged the request; however, there was no evidence that the pilot gave the report. The high-wing airplane was in the process of making a right turn from crosswind to the downwind leg when the low-wing airplane (inbound on a 30 degree entry to downwind) impacted the high-wing airplane's left wing with its propeller and lower engine cowling. The high-wing airplane subsequently lost control, the flight instructor recovered, and conducted an emergency landing in a desert area adjacent to the airport. The low-wing airplane continued to the airport and landed without further incident. Review of the air traffic control system revealed that the control tower was not utilizing the Digital Bright Radar Indicator Tower Equipment (D-BRITE), which would provide controllers with additional radar data on the airplanes, because it was out of service due to being unreliable. However, FAA directives state that the D-BRITE system was never intended to be utilized for traffic separation. The pilots were informed that they did not have radar coverage while in the controlled airspace via the Automatic Terminal Information Service. Additionally, the Airman's Information Manual states that regardless of radar coverage, pilots have the sole responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft.

Probable cause

the failure of both flight crews to see and avoid the other airplane while operating in the traffic pattern, which resulted in a mid-air collision. A contributing factor was the failure of the arriving aircraft to comply with air traffic control requests by not issuing a position report.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record LAX00FA101
Event ID
20001212X20505
Case number
LAX00FA101
Dataset
historical-pre2008
Source SHA-256
89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: local date, investigation status, coordinates. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date; the NTSB stores the UTC date 2000-02-16.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: a72c1dc9b50f9b1861f385a79c6d27e64a6a451bb0b3abccf437c27d0eebf0de; retrieved 2026-09-21T20:18:28.730Z.