FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

Aeroflot Antonov An-2 CCCP-79816 accident

7 Sept 1966 · Murgab river valley, 60 km west of Murghob, Tajik SSR

Antonov An-2 · The Antonov An-2 aircraft CCCP-79816 of the Russian Aeroflot crashed on 7 September 1966

From Dushanbe International Airport (DYU) to Murgab Airport, Tajik SSR

Report a problem

Event

Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
Event fatalities
6 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
Occupants
Unknown
Survivors
0
InjuriesFatal: death within 30 days. Serious: over 48 hours in hospital within a week, most broken bones, severe bleeding, nerve or organ damage, or serious burns. Minor: anything less. Glossary
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation

Antonov An-2

Aircraft type
Antonov AN-2
Category
Airplane · from aircraft type
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
CCCP-79816
Operator
Aeroflot
Onboard fatalities
6
Route
From Dushanbe International Airport (DYU)To Murgab Airport, Tajik SSR

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment

From the investigation findings the Wikipedia article reports, sorted into the NTSB's cause areas with AI assistance.

Not plotted · Not plotted: the Wikipedia article gives no coordinates, and its site names no town or airport that matches exactly.

From the Wikipedia article

The Antonov An-2 aircraft CCCP-79816 of the Russian Aeroflot crashed on 7 September 1966. During a research flight in the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic from Dushanbe to Murghob, it was in a mountain valley when a fire broke out on board. As a result, it collided with a mountain, after which it crashed and all six occupants were killed.

Accident sequence

At 11:30 the crew reported that it was overflying Rushan at an altitude of 4,000 metres. The air traffic controller issued clearance to continue to Murghob, since it had been agreed before departure that, in clear weather, the captain would overfly Lake Sarez on the route from Rushan to Murghob. When the controller warned the aircraft's crew at 12 o'clock of an oncoming Mil Mi-4 helicopter, the captain of the Antonov informed him that he was between Rushan and Murghob.

At 12:16 the captain of the Antonov An-2, Oslov, reported to air traffic control in Khorugh that he had overflown Lake Sarez at 12:15. At 12:21 he reported to air traffic control in Dushanbe that he was flying at an altitude of 4,000 metres. After the confluence of the Murgab and the Zapadny Pshart (“West Pshart”), where there was a place at which a landing of the aircraft would have been possible, the Antonov flew through a gorge bounded on both sides by steep mountain ridges. The next moment a situation arose on board that required an immediate emergency landing. The captain tried to manoeuvre the aircraft out of this predicament by turning it away to the left with the intention of attempting a landing on the riverbank. The manoeuvre failed, however; the aircraft collided with the northern ridge of the gorge and fell down it into the valley. All occupants were killed.

Discovery of the wreck and accident investigation

After the aircraft had not arrived at its destination, it was reported missing. Two days later, on 9 September 1966, the captain of a Mil Mi-4 helicopter discovered the burnt-out remains of the missing Antonov on the bank of the Murgab, at the confluence with the Zapadny Pshart. The time displayed on the cockpit instruments examined as part of the accident investigation was 12:35 (local time). The investigators assumed that this was the time of the accident. While flying a sharp left turn with a bank angle of 70 to 80 degrees and engine power throttled back to 1,500 revolutions per minute, the aircraft was said to have first struck the northern ridge of the canyon with its left wings and immediately afterwards with the propeller and the left landing gear. When these assemblies made contact with a rock, the lower left wing and the left landing gear were torn off, and the propeller blades also broke off. When the fuselage also struck the rock, it deformed and broke apart along frame 13. The next moment the engine struck the rock, whereupon the tail of the aircraft turned through 180 degrees. The aircraft broke apart completely and burned down along 13 frames. Since in the accident the bottoms of two barrels in which petrol was being transported were also burst open and the bottom of a third was torn, the petrol also burned after the impact.

Investigation and cause

Cause

The investigators determined that the cause of the accident was a fire on board caused by dangerous goods being carried. At the crash site an empty, warm canister was found which belonged to the geologist M. and which had been filled with acetone. No signs of blistering or explosion were found. Along the debris field, a burnt loading rod for the window curtains of the cargo hold was found, as well as an entrance door with traces of high-temperature exposure from the inside and fresh engine oil on burnt paint surfaces. Scratches from stones were also discovered on the burnt skin of the rear fuselage. An unburnt page of a topographic map found at the accident site, which also belonged to the geologist M., suggested that this geologist, who had taken the said map from his personal belongings, had accidentally knocked over the canister in flight. The leaked acetone ignited owing to the high temperature from the engine and sparking in the area of an electric motor or the R-25A voltage regulator.

The ignition of the leaked acetone was given as the cause of the accident, with a violation of the regulations for the carriage of dangerous goods being noted. The emergency on board was said to have unfortunately occurred in an area in which an emergency landing was practically impossible.

Translated into English with AI assistance from the German Wikipedia article “Flugunfall der Antonow An-2 CCCP-79816 der Aeroflot” (revision 270052864, retrieved 2026-09-19) by its authors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Extracted as plain text: references, tables, images and some sections are left out; the translation may contain errors, and long articles were cut to their first 700 words. Read the article

Sources

German Wikipedia article: Flugunfall der Antonow An-2 CCCP-79816 der Aeroflot
Article
Flugunfall der Antonow An-2 CCCP-79816 der Aeroflot
Translation
Into English with AI assistance; names of linked operators and aircraft types from Wikidata. It may contain errors.
Revision
270052864 · 2026-08-28 · retrieved 2026-09-19
Wikidata
Q99699962
Licence
Text CC BY-SA 4.0, by the article's authors; Wikidata CC0; town positions GeoNames (CC BY 4.0)
Where each value comes from
Record
de Wikipedia article "Flugunfall der Antonow An-2 CCCP-79816 der Aeroflot" (page 11438177, revision 270052864), translated into English with AI assistance
Date
Wikipedia infobox: date
Place and country
Wikipedia infobox: site
Map position
none
Aircraft, operator and route
Wikipedia infobox: aircraft type, registration, operator, origin and destination; route airports from the linked airport articles' Wikidata codes (OurAirports)
Operation
Reviewed correction (2026-09-26): Aeroflot was flying a research mission rather than a transport service; such aerial work by the state airline counts as general aviation. The article: "During a research flight in the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic from Dushanbe to Murghob"
Fatalities
Wikipedia infobox: aircraft fatalities
Ground fatalities
not stated in the Wikipedia infobox
Summary
Wikipedia article lead
Source notes (1)
  • Wikipedia · Facts from the German Wikipedia article's infobox, translated into English with AI assistance, not checked against an investigation report. Independent review pending.