Air Canada Flight 646
Bombardier CRJ100ER · Stall during attempted low-energy go-around
From Toronto Pearson International Airport (YYZ) to Fredericton International Airport (YFC)
Event
- NTSB case
- DCA98RA012
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Unknown · led by another country; figures from NTSB notifications
- Event fatalities
- 0 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- Occupants
- 42
- Survivors
- 42
- InjuriesFatal: death within 30 days. Serious: over 48 hours in hospital within a week, most broken bones, severe bleeding, nerve or organ damage, or serious burns. Minor: anything less. Glossary
- 35
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- Airline
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Not recorded
Bombardier CRJ100ER
- Flight
- AC676
- Aircraft type
- Bombardier CRJ100
- Category
- Airplane · from aircraft type
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- C-FSKI
- Operator
- Air Canada
- Onboard fatalities
- 0
- Route
- From Toronto Pearson International Airport (YYZ)To Fredericton International Airport (YFC)
- Aircraft age
- Not recorded
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Non-U.S., Commercial
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- Not recorded
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Not recorded
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Not recorded
Cause areas
- Personnel issues › Action/decision
- Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability
- Organizational issues › Development
From the investigation findings the Wikipedia article reports, sorted into the NTSB's cause areas with AI assistance.
Approximate · Estimated position: Fredericton International Airport, the airport the Wikipedia article names as the site. Where on or near it is not known.
From the Wikipedia article
Air Canada Flight 646 was a scheduled domestic flight from Toronto's Lester B. Pearson International Airport to Fredericton, New Brunswick, operated by Air Canada. On December 16, 1997, at 23:48 local time, the Canadair CRJ100ER (CL-65) jet crashed after a failed go-around attempt in Fredericton. All passengers and crew survived, despite a 1-hour, 30-minute emergency response time and inadequate emergency training of the flight crew. The aircraft was damaged beyond repair and written off, making the accident the second hull loss of a CRJ100.
Accident
The weather in Fredericton was difficult — reported weather gave 100 ft of vertical visibility and 1/8 of a mile (200 m) of horizontal visibility. With the runway lights, the runway visibility was 1200 ft for landing on runway 15. At 200 ft above ground level the captain approved the landing, and the first officer, who was the pilot flying, responded that he would land the plane. Once the first officer disengaged the autopilot, the aircraft drifted left of the centre line of the runway and above the proper glidepath, and, as the plane approached 80 ft above ground level, the first officer reduced the engine thrust to idle speed. The captain, knowing the plane was off centre and unsure how much runway was left, ordered a go-around; the first officer had independently come to the same conclusion at about the same time.
Immediately, the first officer advanced the thrust levers, selected go-around mode for his flight director, and pulled back on his control column, and the aircraft began to pitch up. Almost immediately thereafter, the stick shaker activated. Although the first officer reduced the back pressure on his control column, the aircraft continued to pitch up, and soon went into a stall.
The aircraft banked sharply to the right until the wingtip contacted the runway, bending the wing upwards by four feet. Then the aircraft levelled off until the nose contacted the runway. This broke off the right winglet and the nose landing gear, destroyed the radome, and caused heavy damage to the underside of the aircraft. All electrical power except the emergency lighting was lost. By this time, the engines had reached full power, and the aircraft was rolling on its main gear, off the right side of the runway, through the snow, until it hit a ditch that ran parallel to the runway. This sent the plane airborne, where it flew about 1000 ft, struck some trees, and finally came to rest. One large tree had entered the cabin through the main passenger door and cut a path in the fuselage through the first five rows of seats.
The flight attendant, during the crash sequence, shouted brace position commands and once the aircraft stopped, immediately evacuated the aircraft with the assistance of an off-duty flight attendant. Some passengers could not be extricated and required rescue from the Fire Services.
There was no fire on board the aircraft, no fatalities, and many on board were able to evacuate safely. A number of severely injured passengers had to be extracted from the aircraft with the "jaws of life" prior to receiving medical treatment.
Investigation and cause
Investigation
The Transportation Safety Board probe listed 29 causes and contributing factors and an additional 16 aggravating factors in the crash and rescue performance, including the following:
Given the weather conditions, runway conditions, and first officer experience, the decision to allow the first officer to land the plane was questionable, though within policy.
The wings had accumulated ice, degrading their performance, and reducing the maximum angle of attack before stall.
The stick shaker worked as designed but the reduced wing performance reduced the warning time given by the stick shaker.
A go-around without ground contact would not have been possible at the altitude it was ordered due to weather conditions and wing performance.
The flight crew was not trained according to legal requirements in emergency procedures, including go-around, rescue and emergency exits.
Stall-recovery training did not account for the weather conditions at the time of the crash.
The published go-around procedure did not account for the time required for the engines spin up to sufficient thrust for go-around after idling.
Text from the Wikipedia article “Air Canada Flight 646” (revision 1371904156, retrieved 2026-09-18) by its authors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Extracted as plain text: references, tables, images and some sections are left out. Read the article
Sources
Wikipedia article: Air Canada Flight 646
- Article
- Air Canada Flight 646
- Revision
- 1371904156 · 2026-08-29 · retrieved 2026-09-18
- Wikidata
- Q3562607
- Licence
- Text CC BY-SA 4.0, by the article's authors; Wikidata CC0; town positions GeoNames (CC BY 4.0)
NTSB record DCA98RA012
- Event ID
- 20001208X09292
- Case number
- DCA98RA012
- Dataset
- historical-pre2008
- Source SHA-256
- 89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Where each value comes from
- Record
- Wikipedia article "Air Canada Flight 646" (page 6741215, revision 1371904156); merged with NTSB case DCA98RA012 (events / aircraft)
- Date
- Wikipedia infobox: date
- Place and country
- Wikipedia infobox: site
- Map position
- Wikipedia: airport the Wikipedia infobox site links (Wikidata code, OurAirports)
- Aircraft, operator and route
- Wikipedia infobox: aircraft type, registration, operator, origin and destination; route airports from the linked airport articles' Wikidata codes (OurAirports); gaps and aircraft details from NTSB record DCA98RA012
- Operation
- airline flight number in the infobox
- Fatalities
- Wikipedia: Wikipedia infobox: aircraft fatalities
- Ground fatalities
- Wikipedia: not stated in the Wikipedia infobox
- Summary
- Wikipedia infobox: summary
Source notes (2)
- One occurrence in two sources, merged: the Wikipedia article "Air Canada Flight 646" and NTSB case DCA98RA012, matched by the same aircraft registration and date. For this event outside the United States Wikipedia's values are used where the two differ; each value names its source.
- No bulk values were replaced by the NTSB case API.