Atlantic Southeast Airlines Flight 529
Embraer EMB-120RT · Propeller disintegration due to improper maintenance
From Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) to Gulfport Biloxi International Airport (GPT)
Event
- NTSB case
- DCA95MA054
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- Event fatalities
- 9 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- 0
- Occupants
- 29
- Survivors
- 20
- InjuriesFatal: death within 30 days. Serious: over 48 hours in hospital within a week, most broken bones, severe bleeding, nerve or organ damage, or serious burns. Minor: anything less. Glossary
- 20
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- Charter & commuter
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Embraer EMB-120RT
- Flight
- EV7529 / DL7529
- Aircraft type
- Embraer EMB-120
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N256AS
- Operator
- Atlantic Southeast Airlines
- Onboard fatalities
- 9
- Route
- From Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL), HARTSFIELD INT., GATo Gulfport Biloxi International Airport (GPT), Gulfport, MS
- Aircraft age
- Not recorded
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- En route · climb to cruise
- First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Propeller failure/malfunction
- Also codedOther events the NTSB coded in the sequence, such as a wire strike after a loss of power. Flight Findings uses them for its kinds of event. Glossary
- Tree(s)
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Destroyed
Cause areas
- Manufacturer › Inadequate training
- Manufacturer › Information insufficient
- Manufacturer › Maintenance, overhaul, inadequate
- Manufacturer › Procedure inadequate
- Propeller system/accessories, blade › Corroded
- Propeller system/accessories, blade › Fatigue
- Propeller system/accessories, blade › Separation
Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.
From the Wikipedia article
On August 21, 1995, Atlantic Southeast Airlines Flight 529, an Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia flying from Atlanta, Georgia, to Gulfport, Mississippi, crashed in the community of Burwell between the cities of Bowdon, Georgia, and Carrollton, Georgia. Out of the 29 people on board, 9 were killed. The accident bore similarities to Atlantic Southeast Airlines Flight 2311, which had occurred four years earlier, and resulted in the deaths of all 23 people on board. The inquiries of both crashes concluded that design flaws in the aircraft's propellers were to blame.
Accident
Flight 529 left the ramp area at Atlanta at 12:10 Eastern Daylight Time, and took off at 12:23. At 12:43:25, while climbing through 18,100 ft, the occupants of the aircraft heard a thud, which First Officer Warmerdam later described as sounding like "someone had hit a trash can with a baseball bat." The outboard section of one of the blades of the Hamilton Standard propeller on the left engine separated. The separation imbalanced the propeller causing the entire assembly to become dislodged from the resulting violent wobbling, deforming the engine nacelle and distorting the wing's profile. The separated section of the propeller blade landed about 35 miles west of the eventual crash site and was obscured by tall grass for three weeks until it was recovered by a farmer. Although the EMB 120, like all transport-category multi-engine airplanes, is designed to fly with one engine inoperative, the distortion of the engine resulted in excessive drag and loss of lift on the left side of the aircraft, causing it to rapidly lose altitude.
The flight crew initially tried to return to Atlanta for an emergency landing, but the rapid descent resulted in them being diverted to West Georgia Regional Airport. The airplane was unable to stay in the air long enough and the pilots began searching for an open space to make an emergency landing, eventually settling on a field in Carroll County, Georgia, near the farming community of Burwell and the city of Carrollton. At 12:52:45, before the emergency landing could commence, the aircraft pitched over and began an uncommanded dive, striking the tops of the trees before it hit the ground nose first with a slight left bank, the force of which ripped off the weakened left wing. The aircraft skidded along the ground for some distance until it hit an incline in the field and briefly became airborne again, then fell back to the ground while yawing uncontrollably, before finally coming to a stop. The force of the final impact split the fuselage in half around the wingbox, rupturing the fuel tanks, which proved to be fatal during the evacuation of the plane.
Investigation and cause
Probable cause
The probable cause of the accident was determined to be the failure of the propeller due to undiscovered metal fatigue in one blade resulting from corrosion from chlorine. Two previous failures of the same type of propeller had occurred, but those aircraft had been able to land safely. The failed propeller blade had undergone scheduled ultrasonic testing on May 19, 1994, which resulted in its rejection and removal from the propeller. The blade had been sent to a Hamilton Standard facility, where it was subject to refurbishing work that was incorrectly performed. The propeller blade was then installed on the propeller fitted to the aircraft on September 30, 1994.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) criticized Hamilton Standard, which had maintained the propellers, for "inadequate and ineffective corporate inspection and repair techniques, training, documentation, and communication", and both Hamilton Standard and the Federal Aviation Administration for "failure to require recurrent on-wing ultrasonic inspections for the affected propellers". The overcast skies and low cloud ceiling at the crash site also contributed to the severity of the crash.
Text from the Wikipedia article “Atlantic Southeast Airlines Flight 529” (revision 1364119700, retrieved 2026-09-18) by its authors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Extracted as plain text: references, tables, images and some sections are left out. Read the article
NTSB narrative
Atlantic Southeast Airline Flight 529 was climbing through 18,000', when a blade from the left propeller separated. This resulted in distortion of the left engine nacelle, excessive drag, loss of wing lift, & reduced directional control. The degraded performance resulted in a forced landing. While landing, the airplane passed through trees, impacted the ground, & was further damaged by postimpact fire. An exam of the left propeller revealed the blade had failed due to a fatigue crack that originated from multiple corrosion pits in the taper bore surface of the blade spar. The crack had propagated toward the outside of the blade & around both sides of the taper bore. Due to 2 previous blade failures (separations), a borescope inspection procedure had been developed by Hamilton Standard to inspect returned blades (that had rejectable ultrasonic indications) for evidence of cracks, pits & corrosion. The accident blade was one of 490 rejected blades that had been sent to Hamilton Standard for further evaluation & possible repair. Maintenance technicians, who inspected the blade, lacked proper NDI familiarization training & specific equipment to identify the corrosion that resulted in fatigue. (See: NTSB/AAR-96/06 for additional information.)
Probable cause
the in-flight fatigue fracture and separation of a propeller blade resulting in distortion of the left engine nacelle, causing excessive drag, loss of wing lift, and reduced directional control of the airplane. The fracture was caused by a fatigue crack from multiple corrosion pits that were not discovered by Hamilton Standard because of inadequate and ineffective corporate inspection and repair techniques, training, documentation, and communications. Contributing to the accident was Hamilton Standard's and FAA's failure to require recurrent on-wing ultrasonic inspections of the affected propellers. Contributing to the severity of the accident was the overcast cloud ceiling at the accident site.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
Wikipedia article: Atlantic Southeast Airlines Flight 529
- Revision
- 1364119700 · 2026-07-14 · retrieved 2026-09-18
- Wikidata
- Q756253
- Licence
- Text CC BY-SA 4.0, by the article's authors; Wikidata CC0; town positions GeoNames (CC BY 4.0)
NTSB record DCA95MA054
- Event ID
- 20001207X04223
- Case number
- DCA95MA054
- Dataset
- historical-pre2008
- Source SHA-256
- 89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Where each value comes from
- Record
- Wikipedia article "Atlantic Southeast Airlines Flight 529" (page 4249837, revision 1364119700); merged with NTSB case DCA95MA054 (events / aircraft)
- Date
- NTSB record DCA95MA054: NTSB API eventDate, eventTimeUtc and eventTimeUtcOffsetHours (local date)
- Place and country
- Wikipedia infobox: site; country from NTSB record DCA95MA054
- Map position
- NTSB record DCA95MA054: events decimal coordinates
- Aircraft, operator and route
- NTSB record DCA95MA054: aircraft; gaps from Wikipedia infobox: aircraft type, registration, operator, origin and destination; route airports from the linked airport articles' Wikidata codes (OurAirports)
- Operation
- NTSB record DCA95MA054: operated under Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter
- Fatalities
- Reviewed (2026-09-19): NTSB final report AAR-96/06 (table: 8 fatal; footnote 8: one more passenger died 4 months after the accident, not counted as fatal under 49 CFR 830.2), https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR9606.pdf
- Ground fatalities
- Reviewed (2026-09-19): NTSB final report AAR-96/06 (table: 8 fatal; footnote 8: one more passenger died 4 months after the accident, not counted as fatal under 49 CFR 830.2), https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR9606.pdf
- Summary
- Wikipedia infobox: summary
Source notes (4)
- One occurrence in two sources, merged: the Wikipedia article "Atlantic Southeast Airlines Flight 529" and NTSB case DCA95MA054, matched by the same aircraft registration and date. For this US event the NTSB's values are used where the two differ; each value names its source.
- Death toll settled: the NTSB record (DCA95MA054) gives 8 and the Wikipedia article 9; NTSB final report AAR-96/06 (table: 8 fatal; footnote 8: one more passenger died 4 months after the accident, not counted as fatal under 49 CFR 830.2) gives 9. Later death. The NTSB's 8 are the captain and 7 passengers who died within 30 days. A ninth passenger died of her injuries 4 months later; the report records this in a footnote but, under the 30-day rule, not in the fatal count.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.