FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

Braniff Airways Flight 542

29 Sept 1959 · Leon County, near Buffalo, Texas

Lockheed L-188A Electra · In-flight breakup

From William P. Hobby Airport (HOU) to John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK)

Report a problem

Event

Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
Event fatalities
34 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
Occupants
34
Survivors
0
InjuriesFatal: death within 30 days. Serious: over 48 hours in hospital within a week, most broken bones, severe bleeding, nerve or organ damage, or serious burns. Minor: anything less. Glossary
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
Airline

Lockheed L-188A Electra

Aircraft type
Lockheed L-188
Category
Airplane · from aircraft type
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N9705C
Onboard fatalities
34
Route
From William P. Hobby Airport (HOU)To John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK)

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures

From the investigation findings the Wikipedia article reports, sorted into the NTSB's cause areas with AI assistance.

Approximate · Estimated position: Buffalo, Texas, near the place the Wikipedia article names. Not the accident site.

From the Wikipedia article

Braniff Airways Flight 542 was a scheduled flight between Houston International Airport and Idlewild Airport in New York City. On September 29, 1959, while en route to a scheduled stop at Dallas Love Field, the Lockheed L-188 Electra operating the flight broke apart in mid-air without warning, about 4 mi southeast of Buffalo, Texas. Eyewitnesses who saw the crash said they saw an explosion in the air, and then the aircraft plummeted to the ground. The left wing separated from the plane close to where it attaches to the fuselage and landed more than a mile (two kilometers) from the main crash site. The explosion and resulting crash left no survivors.

The aircraft was almost brand new, and had been in commercial service for only nine days after it was delivered from the factory. Crash investigators combed through the wreckage in search of the cause of the breakup, but after six months, they had still not determined what had caused the wing separation. As they were preparing to close the investigation without determining a probable cause, Northwest Airlines Flight 710 crashed near Cannelton, Indiana. That aircraft was a seven-month-old Lockheed Electra, and witnesses also described seeing it explode in flight before crashing to the ground. Investigators found that the entire right wing and portions of the left wing had broken off that aircraft while it was in flight.

The similarities between the two crashes led to the Federal Aviation Agency placing flight restrictions on the Electra until the cause of the two similar crashes could be identified. It ordered Lockheed Corporation to reevaluate the aircraft's structural integrity and prove its airworthiness. The subsequent investigation, involving over 250 engineers and technicians, found that when an Electra with damage to the mounting structures of one of the engines flew at high speeds or in turbulent conditions, a destructive phenomenon called "whirl mode wing flutter" could occur. The phenomenon caused the wing to flutter severely, causing the metal to fatigue and eventually snap. After discovering the cause of the wing failures, Lockheed launched a program to design structural changes to prevent whirl mode wing flutter and to retrofit all Electras already in service. The changes successfully resolved the issue, and modifications to the final aircraft were completed on July 5, 1961.

Background

In 1959, Braniff Airways served 48 cities in 17 states across the United States. The previous year, it had carried more than two million passengers, and at the beginning of 1959 it operated a fleet of 66 piston-engine aircraft. That year, the company planned to put eight new L-188 Electra turboprop aircraft into service. Braniff had ordered nine of the new aircraft in 1955 as part of a $57 million fleet expansion program. It received the first two aircraft on May 7, 1959, and placed them into service in mid-June. The first routes to use the Electra were flights from Texas to Chicago and from Texas to New York City.

Turbine-powered aircraft were a recent development in the aviation industry and were welcomed by the flying public. Turboprop flights attracted more passengers than comparable piston-powered flights because they were faster and smoother. Airlines operating the Electra promoted it as a faster and more powerful aircraft that would reduce flight times by an average of 20 percent compared with piston-engine aircraft. The Electra cruised approximately 100 mph faster than any other propeller-driven aircraft of its time. American Airlines, which began operating the Electra between New York and Chicago in January 1959, reported that 80 percent of the seats on its Electra flights were sold, 20 percent more than on its piston-engine flights. Eastern Airlines reported that sales on Electra flights were 10 to 15 percent higher than on comparable piston-aircraft flights.

Braniff operated Flight 542 as a regularly scheduled service from Houston International Airport to Idlewild Airport in New York City, with scheduled stops at Dallas Love Field and Washington National Airport. On September 29, 1959, the aircraft assigned to the flight was one of the airline's newest Electras. When it departed Houston, it carried 28 passengers and a crew of six, leaving the aircraft less than half full. Additional passengers were scheduled to board in Dallas for the next leg of the flight. Earlier that day, the aircraft had experienced problems with an engine-driven electrical generator. Repairs performed in Houston delayed Flight 542's departure by 22 minutes. The aircraft left the gate at 10:37 p.m., and took off at 10:44. The overnight flight was scheduled to arrive in New York City at 6:20 the following morning.

Accident

At 11:05 p.m., the aircraft was flying at an altitude of 15000 ft east of Waco, Texas. Visibility was good, with scattered clouds below the aircraft at about 12000 ft. The pilots contacted the San Antonio Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) to report their speed and altitude and to advise that they had crossed a planned waypoint over Leona, Texas. Controllers told them to contact the Fort Worth ARTCC for further clearance. Two minutes later, the pilots contacted Braniff Airways on a private frequency to report several mechanical issues that would require attention upon arrival in Dallas. The aircraft had problems with its propeller de-icing system and one engine had a malfunctioning fuel sump pump. Neither issue was considered a critical emergency, but Braniff's maintenance policies would have prevented the plane from leaving Dallas until the fuel pump issue was resolved.

When Flight 542 failed to check in with Fort Worth Center as instructed, the controllers attempted to contact the crew. After receiving no response, they continued trying to reach the flight for more than 30 minutes. Believing that the aircraft might have been experiencing radio problems, controllers kept air traffic clear of airports in Houston and Dallas in case the crew attempted to land without being able to communicate.

At 11:09 p.m., the aircraft broke apart in flight, producing flashes and fire seen by witnesses on the ground. Witnesses described seeing a blinding flash in the sky, followed by a loud clap of thunder and flaming objects falling for several seconds before the flames disappeared. One witness described hearing a series of explosions, sounding like "boom, boom, boom," while others believed the noise was a sonic boom caused by supersonic aircraft from nearby James Connally Air Force Base. An Air Force pilot said he initially thought the sound was that of an atomic bomb exploding. People as far as 100 mi away reported seeing the explosion.

Over the next five minutes, debris and bodies fell from the sky. The wreckage was scattered across an area approximately 2+1/2 mi long and 1 mi wide. The nose and the tail section came to rest within 100 yd of each other and only 150 yd from a farmhouse, whose occupants described the noise as "like a bulldozer falling out of the sky". Because the farmhouse did not have a telephone, one of the residents drove to the nearby town of Buffalo to notify authorities. There, he encountered a Texas Highway Patrol officer who had already been awakened by the noise. The officer called the regional office of the Texas Department of Public Safety in Waco to report that an aircraft had crashed before proceeding to the farm. By 1:00 a.m., eight men and five ambulances had arrived at the scene, and additional personnel arrived during the following hour.

The crash was the fifth fatal accident in Braniff's 31-year history and the first in which there were no survivors. The airline had one of the strongest safety records in the industry, and had received annual safe-operation awards from the National Safety Council. The accident was the second fatal crash involving the Lockheed Electra, which had entered commercial service less than a year earlier.

Accident report

The CAB released the final accident report on May 5, 1961. It said that the aircraft had suffered an in-flight breakup into a number of major sections, including the propeller and gearbox from the left outboard engine; the left wing containing the remaining parts of the outboard engine and the entire inboard engine; the right outboard engine; the end of the left stabilizer; the outer portions of the right wing; and the remaining fuselage and empennage with the right inboard engine and the inner portion of the right wing. The left wing struck the ground first and the fuel in the wing fuel tank triggered an intense ground fire. The point where the wing break occurred was located between the inboard engine and the fuselage. The report made note of the fact that a great deal of effort had been made to verify the working condition of the engines at the time of the crash, and that the investigators could not find any sign of failure of malfunction in the engines prior to the start of the separation from the wing. It said that it was evident that the aircraft broke up quickly and with little warning due to the fact that only one of the seats was found with the safety belt fastened, suggesting that there had been no time to order passengers to fasten them. The report concluded that the investigation was not able to determine a positive indication of the cause of the breakup, but through a process of elimination of other factors, the evidence supported the conclusion that whirl mode wing flutter had caused the crash.

Investigation and cause

Investigation

After receiving news of the crash, the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) immediately sent five accident investigators to the area, with more arriving over the following days. They were divided into five teams, each focusing on a separate aspect of the crash investigation. CAB representatives said that they expected the investigation at the crash site location to take two or three weeks and that the teams on the ground were focused on gathering information and evidence, and not trying to reach conclusions about what had caused the accident. Investigators meticulously identified every piece of debris and where it was found before it was moved, no matter how small it was, and each location was plotted on a map of the area. CAB officials restricted access to the Braniff offices in Dallas, not allowing reporters inside.

Shortly after the accident, a Braniff spokesperson described the aircraft as looking like it had been "blown open" in the air. He said there were signs that at least one section of the plane had buckled outward, like an explosion inside the plane had occurred. One unidentified investigator mentioned that the disintegration of the airliner could have been caused by an explosive loss of cabin air pressure from the aircraft. A CAB investigator cautioned about jumping to conclusions about explosions, telling reporters that so far, they hadn't even determined if the aircraft had been in one piece when it hit the ground. Investigators reported finding burn marks on some parts of the rear of the fuselage and tail, and the outside of some of the windows at the rear of the plane showed signs that they had been exposed to tremendous heat. Some pieces of the recovered fragments of the plane were sent to Washington, D.C., for further testing for traces of explosives, metal fatigue, overstress, and other causes. The FBI also began reviewing the details of the cargo that had been carried in the rear cargo hold. By October 1, an anonymous FAA official told reporters that they had ruled out the possibility of an explosive device causing the crash. He said that none of the bodies that had been recovered had any obvious signs of burns and did not have any odors that were consistent with explosives. Investigators also ruled out weather as a factor, saying the night was clear and calm.

On October 6, investigators, still unable to find all of the wreckage of the aircraft due to the thick brush and heavy rains, announced that a crew of 280 soldiers from Fort Hood would assist with the search for debris. The soldiers would walk in a line, spaced 10 ft apart. They would pick up everything they saw, even old litter, if there was a possibility that it had come from the aircraft. They covered an area 2+1/2 mi long and 1 mi wide.

Meanwhile, rumors about the crash spread throughout the aviation community and in the news. A pilot for a foreign airline told colleagues that he had heard that a fighter plane had landed at a Texas Air Force base immediately after the crash with one of its Sidewinder heat-seeking missiles missing. The story was relayed to CAB officials in Dallas, who passed it on to investigators in Washington. The CAB asked the Air Force and Navy to perform a complete inspection of all of its aircraft to see if any of them were missing any missiles. The check was completed, with both services being able to account for all of their munitions, and the pilot's story was dismissed as a hoax. In another instance, newspapers reported that an engineer who had flown from Chicago to Houston on the same plane just before the crash told reporters that he had felt a bulge in the floor under his seat in the ninth row as the plane took off.

Text from the Wikipedia article “Braniff Airways Flight 542” (revision 1370587145, retrieved 2026-09-18) by its authors, under CC BY-SA 4.0. Extracted as plain text: references, tables, images and some sections are left out. Read the article

Sources

Wikipedia article: Braniff Airways Flight 542
Article
Braniff Airways Flight 542
Revision
1370587145 · 2026-08-22 · retrieved 2026-09-18
Wikidata
Q4957364
Licence
Text CC BY-SA 4.0, by the article's authors; Wikidata CC0; town positions GeoNames (CC BY 4.0)
Where each value comes from
Record
Wikipedia article "Braniff Airways Flight 542" (page 24060757, revision 1370587145)
Date
Wikipedia infobox: date
Place and country
Wikipedia infobox: site
Map position
place the Wikipedia infobox site links (Wikidata coordinates)
Aircraft, operator and route
Wikipedia infobox: aircraft type, registration, operator, origin and destination; route airports from the linked airport articles' Wikidata codes (OurAirports)
Operation
flight number in the article title
Fatalities
Wikipedia infobox: aircraft fatalities
Ground fatalities
not stated in the Wikipedia infobox
Summary
Wikipedia infobox: summary
Source notes (1)
  • Wikipedia · Facts from the Wikipedia article's infobox and coordinates, not checked against an investigation report. Independent review pending.