CEN25FA151 · Aeronca 7AC
Aeronca 7AC · Accident: collision with terrain/object (non-CFIT) while maneuvering
Event
- NTSB case
- CEN25FA151
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Ongoing
- API-reported fatalities
- 1 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Aeronca 7AC
- Aircraft type
- Aeronca 7
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N83952
- Operator
- Unknown
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From not recordedTo not recorded
- Aircraft age
- About 79 years (built 1946)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- Maneuvering · low-altitude flying
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Collision with terrain/object (non-CFIT)
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
No findings designated as a cause are recorded in the NTSB data yet.
Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
On April 10, 2025, at 0904 central daylight time, an Aeronca 7AC airplane, N83952, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Cape Fair, Missouri. The pilot received serious injuries, and the passenger was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 personal flight. GPS data downloaded from a Stratus receiver recovered from the airplane wreckage showed that the flight originated from the pilot’s private airstrip at 0842. The airplane departed the grass airstrip and flew around the area in a non-descript path as would be expected during a pleasure flight. The data showed that the airplane approached the area where the accident occurred from the south. It then made a right turn toward the southeast, immediately followed by a left turn to the southwest. During the final portion of the left turn, the airplane started descending, leveled off, and flew down a valley in the terrain. A set of high-voltage powerlines crossed the valley perpendicular to the airplane’s flight path. It was reported that the utility company spliced two damaged wires after the accident, but the wires had not fallen to the ground.
Figure 1. Entire flight path of airplane.
Figure 2. The final portion of the accident flight. A witness to the accident was a friend of the pilot and passenger and was working to construct a pond on his property. He reported that he was in an excavator when he saw the airplane fly over. He stated that the airplane then flew off and he thought it had departed the area. A few minutes later he heard it again, and from his peripheral vision, he saw the airplane crash. The airplane came to rest on the witness’s property underneath the powerlines that were struck by the airplane. Examination of the airplane at the accident site confirmed continuity of the flight control system from the cockpit controls to each respective control surface. Examination of the engine confirmed crankshaft rotation without difficulty. Cylinder compression, suction, and valve train continuity were verified during rotation. Spark could not be obtained at the spark plugs due to impact damage to the spark plug leads; however, spark was observed for all cylinders on both magnetos when the leads were trimmed at the distributor caps. The carburetor was removed, and fuel was present in the fuel bowl. No sediment was observed in the bowl. No preimpact anomalies were detected during the examination of the engine or the airframe.
Verbatim NTSB factual narrative from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record CEN25FA151
- Event ID
- 20250410199989
- Case number
- CEN25FA151
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 6c47ce4051adec4858b2dd09d1374d3b7dc95b61ff78c64936d5b0505abd537d; retrieved 2026-09-15T09:03:45.743Z.