CEN24LA272 · Air Tractor AT-602
AgWerx Aviation Air Tractor AT-602 · Accident: fuel starvation while maneuvering
From Tekamah Municipal Airport (TQE) to Tekamah Municipal Airport (TQE)
Event
- NTSB case
- CEN24LA272
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- Event fatalities
- Unknown
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Air Tractor AT-602
- Aircraft type
- Air Tractor AT-602
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N622AW
- Operator
- AgWerx Aviation
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Tekamah Municipal Airport (TQE), Tekamah, NETo Tekamah Municipal Airport (TQE), Tekamah, NE
- Aircraft age
- About 2 years (built 2022)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 137: Agricultural
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- Maneuvering · low-altitude flying
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Fuel starvation
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems
- Personnel issues › Psychological
- Personnel issues › Task performance
Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
The pilot was conducting an agricultural flight when there was a sudden loss of engine power during an aerial-application spray turn. The airplane’s aft fuselage was substantially damaged during the subsequent forced landing in a cornfield.
According to engine monitor data, as the aerial-application flight progressed, there was an overall decrease in fuel in the right-wing fuel tank and a minimal decrease of fuel in the left-wing fuel tank. The airplane’s wing fuel tanks are interconnected through a header tank and cannot be individually selected. As the flight progressed, the fuel imbalance increased until the right-wing tank was depleted of usable fuel and there was a sudden loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. The left-wing tank contained nearly 80 gallons of fuel at the time of the accident.
Examination of the airplane’s fuel system did not reveal any preimpact anomalies that would have precluded normal distribution of fuel from the fuel tanks to the engine. According to the airplane flight manual, fuel can migrate from one tank to the other if the airplane is flown uncoordinated or if all turns are made in the same direction. A postaccident examination confirmed that the airplane was equipped with a required cockpit placard that instructed pilots avoid skidding turns, which may result in fuel migration from one tank to another, that the engine may lose power when either tank becomes empty, and to monitor the fuel level in each tank frequently when the fuel level is less than ½ tank.
During the final 12 minutes of the flight, the engine monitor’s master caution parameter activated multiple times when the fuel level in the right-wing tank decreased below 11 gallons. The master warning parameter can be activated by several factors; however, at that time the recorded fuel level in the right-wing tank (less than 11 gallons) was the only parameter that would have activated the master caution. Additionally, the airplane’s low fuel warning system functioned normally when tested after the accident. As such, it is likely the pilot failed to notice or acknowledge the low fuel warnings that were presented in the cockpit during the flight.
Based on the available information, the pilot likely did not maintain coordinated flight during the aerial-application flight, which resulted in fuel migrating from the right-wing tank to the left-wing tank. Additionally, the pilot did not adequately monitor fuel levels during the flight which resulted in fuel starvation to the engine when the right-wing tank was depleted of usable fuel.
Probable cause
The pilot’s failure to maintain coordinated flight during aerial-application operations, which resulted in fuel migration between the interconnected wing fuel tanks, and his failure to adequately monitor fuel levels during the flight which resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation when the right-wing tank became depleted of usable fuel.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record CEN24LA272
- Event ID
- 20240718194716
- Case number
- CEN24LA272
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: cc11a193f0a0b6b5cd3f757970b252d85efa7fa335d4257efaea73651606076e; retrieved 2026-09-16T19:03:31.821Z.