FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

WPR24FA104 · Kolb Company FIRESTAR KXP

7 Mar 2024 · Cave Junction, OR, United States

Kolb Company FIRESTAR KXP · Accident: aerodynamic stall/spin while maneuvering

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
WPR24FA104
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
1 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Kolb Company FIRESTAR KXP

Aircraft type
Kolb FIRESTAR KXP
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N4443G
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From not recordedTo not recorded
Aircraft age
About 29 years (built 1995)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Maneuvering · low-altitude flying
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Aerodynamic stall/spin
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability
  • Personnel issues › Physical
  • Personnel issues › Task performance

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The pilot had recently installed an overhauled engine and decided to depart for a local flight. Witnesses observed that the pilot was in good spirits and that, after takeoff, the airplane turned left to the northwest, about 500 ft above ground level (agl). The airplane continued to turn left back towards the airport environment on a 30° to 40° bank angle (to the southeast). The witnesses stated that they saw the airplane descend about 100 ft in a slightly nose-down pitch attitude and subsequently entered a 90° nose-down attitude toward the ground. The airplane impacted the ground and came to rest in an open field, sustaining substantial damage to the fuselage and wings. Multiple witnesses confirmed that the engine was producing power. Examination of the wreckage did not reveal any mechanical anomalies to the airframe or engine. The pilot’s toxicology results identified multiple potentially impairing substances including diphenhydramine, gabapentin, and venlafaxine, all of which may adversely and unpredictably interact with one another to cause sedation, decreased reaction time, and impaired cognition. Venlafaxine may induce mania in people with bipolar disorder if used on its own to treat depression without an additional mood stabilizing medication. Based on information obtained from the patient’s family, the pilot had severe depression and bipolar disorder. The details of the pilot’s illness and his response to treatment are unknown. An episode documented by law enforcement the night before the accident was consistent with the pilot experiencing acute behavioral symptoms at that time. In people with bipolar disorder, the occurrence of acute symptoms decreases the threshold for further episodes, making the episodes occur more frequently if medical intervention is not provided. Additionally, bipolar disorder in people over 50 years of age increases the risk of cognitive defects including decreased executive function, impaired information processing speed, and impaired memory. Additionally, bipolar disorder is a disqualifying psychiatric condition that is required to be evaluated by a Federal Air Surgeon. The pilot never reapplied for a medical after he allowed it to lapse in 2002 and there are no records he was evaluated. With the available evidence, it is not possible to discern to what degree the effects of the medications used, as opposed to the pilot’s bipolar disorder, contributed to the accident. The pilot’s coronary artery disease placed him at some increased risk of a sudden impairing or incapacitating cardiac event, such as angina, arrhythmia, or heart attack, but there was no autopsy evidence that such an event occurred. However, such an event does not leave reliable autopsy evidence if it occurs immediately before death. Thus, whether the pilot's coronary artery disease contributed to the crash cannot be determined. The pilot's use of multiple potentially impairing substances and his bipolar disorder likely would have contributed to a diminished state of health during any attempts to recover the airplane after control was lost, given the pilot's experience with the airplane and the circumstances of the accident. The airplane was likely in an uncoordinated left turn (skid) as it turned back toward the airport. The lower (left) wing entered an aerodynamic stall initially during this skidding left turn, resulting in a nose-down pitch attitude, as is typical of straight-wing airplanes. The FAA suggests a margin of at least 1,500 ft agl for single-engine airplanes to recover from a full stall. Although the pilot was a certificated flight instructor and experienced pilot, his use of potentially impairing substances and medical history likely influenced his reaction time to recover from the stall at 500 ft agl. There was insufficient evidence to ascertain the specific recovery inputs the pilot implemented.

Probable cause

The pilot's exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack during a turn, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's use of potentially impairing substances with bipolar disorder, which resulted in a decreased reaction time during a stall recovery at a low altitude.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record WPR24FA104
Event ID
20240307193897
Case number
WPR24FA104
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 29e0d549dbf155fa06aa318f6a0aed7b099475c419bfb3a0d2af3686bf0e9c7f; retrieved 2026-09-15T08:11:31.474Z.