FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

ERA22FA422 · Wren Ronnie D TITAN II

17 Sept 2022 · Citra, FL, United States

Wren Ronnie D TITAN II · Accident: loss of control in flight while maneuvering

From Patch O Blue Airport (FD02) to an unrecorded destination

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
ERA22FA422
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
2 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Wren Ronnie D TITAN II

Aircraft type
Wren Ronnie TITAN
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N709RD
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Patch O Blue Airport (FD02), Orange Springs, FLTo not recorded
Aircraft age
About 27 years (built 1995)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Maneuvering · aerobatics
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Loss of control in flight
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision
  • Personnel issues › Physical
  • Personnel issues › Task performance

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The pilot and passenger departed a private airport in an experimental amateur-built airplane. A witness who knew the pilot described the pilot as flying “aggressively” and observed the airplane complete a barrel roll, and then enter into an aerodynamic stall and spin into a swamp. The witness also advised that it sounded as if the engine was brought back or went back to idle power. Postaccident examination of the accident site and wreckage revealed that there was no debris path, the wreckage was partially submerged, and the odor of fuel was present, along with a fuel sheen on the surface of the water. Flight control continuity was established. The throttle control was in the closed (idle) position and damage to two of the three propeller blades showed no leading-edge gouges or chordwise scratches that would indicate that the propellers were operating under high power at impact. The third propeller blade was submerged in the swamp and could not be examined. The engine was also submerged in the swamp, was not recovered, and could not be examined. Review of weight and balance information indicated that the airplane was likely being operated in excess of the kit manufacturer’s published gross weight. The weight would have resulted in a higher stalling speed, which would have made the airplane more difficult to control in the barrel roll and more difficult to recover once the stall and spin had begun. The pilot was employed as an airline pilot. He was on medical leave for depression, anxiety, and a head injury. The pilot’s toxicology was positive for ethanol. The consistency of ethanol levels across multiple postmortem specimens, including vitreous fluid, indicated that the pilot likely had consumed ethanol before the accident. Based on the ethanol concentrations he likely experienced degradation of judgment and deficits in coordination, psychomotor skills, perception, and attention. In addition, the pilot’s toxicology results detected delta-9-THC and its metabolites 11-hydroxy-THC and carboxy-delta-9-THC. Research shows poor and inconsistent correlation between the degree of impairment and delta-9-THC blood levels in living persons. Interpretation of levels in postmortem cavity blood is further complicated by cavity blood’s potential for contamination. Thus, the pilot’s delta-9-THC results could not be used to determine if specific impairing effects were present. In addition, the pilot’s toxicology results detected other central nervous system depressant medications including quetiapine and gabapentin, both of which can adversely interact with one another, in addition to ethanol, to worsen impairment—most commonly in the form of drowsiness, difficulty concentrating, and confusion. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) medical case review, the pilot had a significant history of depression and anxiety. Depression can impact risk perception; specifically, some depressed persons will avoid risk to avoid anxiety, while others may engage in risky behavior without consideration of the consequences. One month before the accident, a psychologist assessed the pilot via formal neurocognitive testing and recommended him for consideration of Special Issuance medical certification. The pilot’s psychiatrist assessed the pilot’s condition to be “stable.” Thus, whether the pilot’s psychiatric condition contributed to the accident could not be determined. The pilot’s autopsy detected mild coronary artery disease with low grade stenoses and a flabby myocardium. Due to his mild heart disease, the pilot was at a slightly increased risk of a sudden distracting, impairing, or incapacitating cardiac event, including angina, arrhythmia, or heart attack; however, there is no forensic evidence that such an event occurred. The circumstances of the accident with the pilot actively controlling the airplane through an aerobatic maneuver is generally inconsistent with a sudden incapacitating event. Thus, it is unlikely that the pilot’s heart disease contributed to the accident. In summary, the airplane’s overweight condition, and the pilot’s use of ethanol, delta-9-THC, gabapentin, and quetiapine before the accident, likely contributed to the accident. The contribution of the pilot’s mental health to the accident could not be determined.

Probable cause

The pilot’s exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack and failure to maintain airspeed while recovering from an aerobatic maneuver, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and loss of control. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s use of ethanol and other depressant medications, and his decision to operate the airplane outside of the published weight limitations.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record ERA22FA422
Event ID
20220918105958
Case number
ERA22FA422
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 7e4bb61c318f4637ee43167aa4aac15598b29bdf839d24c3dc135e6099fb82a6; retrieved 2026-09-15T07:51:20.612Z.