ANC21LA064 · Piper PA-14
Piper PA-14 · Accident: flight control system malfunction/failure while maneuvering
Event
- NTSB case
- ANC21LA064
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- Event fatalities
- Unknown
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Piper PA-14
- Aircraft type
- Piper PA-14
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N4206H
- Operator
- Unknown
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From not recordedTo not recorded
- Aircraft age
- About 73 years (built 1948)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- Maneuvering
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Flight control system malfunction/failure
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
- Aircraft › Aircraft structures
Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
The pilot reported that while in level cruise flight, frequent left and right rudder inputs were required to keep the inclinometer centered, similar to a light turbulence encounter. The airplane then began to experience a constant yaw, with elevator adjustments required to maintain level flight. He stated that the oscillation then stopped and a “very large right rudder input” was required to maintain the course heading. The pilot was able to maintain control of the airplane and land uneventfully.
An initial examination of the rudder revealed that the vertical spar tube separated above the upper hinge point and the top portion of the rudder folded over the horizontal stabilizer tail brace wires. Further examination of the accident airplane’s rudder post found radial features with crack arrest lines, consistent with fatigue from multiple origins at the outer diameter. The piece of post from the upper side of the fracture was further examined using a scanning electron microscope. Multiple fatigue origins were identified on the right side that originated from corrosion pits on the exterior surface. Fatigue fracture features were identified around approximately 1/4 of the circumference on the right side, but the total extent of fatigue cracking could not be determined conclusively due to post-fracture contact damage on the surfaces.
Analysis of the rudder post’s material composition found it to be consistent with Piper part number 40622. According to engineering drawings, part number 40622 rudder posts were originally manufactured from American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) 1025 carbon steel. A Piper engineering change order specified a change to AISI 4130 low-alloy steel that was incorporated into the part number 40622 engineering drawing in June 1974. According to Advisory Circular 23-27, Parts and Materials Substitution for Vintage Aircraft, AISI 4130 lowalloy steel generally has more desirable material properties, such as higher tensile ultimate strength, yield strength, and fatigue strength.
As part of the NTSB’s investigation of a similar rudder failure on a Piper PA-12, the NTSB performed a rudder loads study that analyzed various structural loads and associated stresses on three other similarly fractured rudders; the posts from these rudders were also found to be consistent with part number 40622 and composed of AISI 1025 carbon steel. The structural load analysis found that, with no scatter factor applied, the bending stress from certification gust and maneuver loads is significantly closer to the endurance limit of AISI 1025 carbon steel than to the endurance limit of AISI 4130 low-alloy steel.
In addition, corrosion, scratches, or surface roughness features were observed on each of the rudder posts examined as part of the NTSB’s study, and, as previously stated, examination of the post from this accident identified corrosion pits on the exterior surface. These types of surface anomalies can occur over time during normal operations and can weaken metal material where they occur. Because AISI 1025 carbon steel has lower overall and fatigue strength than AISI 4130 low-alloy steel, the surface anomalies likely made the affected rudder posts more susceptible to fatigue failure during normal service conditions than they would have been if manufactured with 4130 low-alloy steel.
Thus, the rudder failure on the accident airplane was due to the fatigue fracture of the AISI 1025 carbon steel rudder post. Contributing to the fatigue failure was the post’s susceptibility to fatigue cracking under normal service conditions.
Probable cause
The fatigue fracture of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) 1025 carbon steel rudder post, which resulted in structural failure of the rudder. Contributing to the fatigue failure was the post’s susceptibility to fatigue cracking under normal service conditions.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record ANC21LA064
- Event ID
- 20210726103552
- Case number
- ANC21LA064
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: bf00d307657a8d2226ed540b0c0e4f871c4c06d8fea9f31d2a4717a777fc023a; retrieved 2026-09-16T14:19:39.924Z.