ENG21LA011 · Cessna 501 CITATION
Interstellar Air Cessna 501 CITATION · Incident: uncontained engine failure during takeoff
From Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport (OPF) to Williston Municipal Airport (X60)
Event
- NTSB case
- ENG21LA011
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Incident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- Event fatalities
- Unknown
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Cessna 501 CITATION
- Aircraft type
- Cessna 501
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N75TL
- Operator
- Interstellar Air
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport (OPF), Opa Locka, FLTo Williston Municipal Airport (X60), Williston, FL
- Aircraft age
- Not recorded
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- Takeoff · rejected takeoff
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Uncontained engine failure
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Minor
Cause areas
- Aircraft › Aircraft power plant
Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
The No. 1 (left) engine high pressure compressor (HPC) impeller developed a low cycle fatigue (LCF) crack that originated from a machining feature (groove) on the aft face of the impeller. The machining groove was created during the part manufacturing process. The LCF crack progressed to overload and resulted in an uncontained HPC impeller failure and secondary impact damage throughout the engine gaspath.
Pratt & Whitney Canada (PWC) released a service bulletin (SB) in May 2003 that recommended a one-time borescope inspection of the HPC impeller aft face to check for evidence of machining grooves. The borescope inspection was subsequently mandated by Transport Canada and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airworthiness directives (AD). The incident engine was inspected in accordance with the SB inspection instructions in May 2004, with no HPC impeller machining anomalies noted.
Following the incident, the HPC impeller fragments were inspected at the PWC facility in Bridgeport, West Virginia in accordance with the overhaul manual procedures. Aside from impact damage created during the incident event, the machining grooves present on the HPC impeller aft face would have passed inspection criteria. It is unlikely the machining grooves would have been visible during the SB borescope inspection performed in May 2004, particularly given the technology available at the time.
A crack striation count was performed as part of the materials laboratory analysis of the incident HPC impeller. Assuming each crack striation correlates to one engine cycle, a 1/32 inch crack (thumbnail shape) would have formed on the HPC impeller aft face surface at approximately 1,970 engine cycles. The engine had accumulated 6,803 cycles since new when the HPC impeller borescope inspection was performed in May 2004. The crack would have been detectable by fluorescent penetrant inspection as outlined in the recently released corrective actions discussed in the factual section of this report.
Probable cause
An uncontained left engine failure caused by a low cycle fatigue crack that originated from a manufacturing machining groove on the high pressure compressor impeller aft face. Contributing to the incident was service bulletin borescope inspection criteria that was insufficient to detect the presence of machining grooves on the high pressure compressor impeller at the time the incident engine was inspected in May 2004.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record ENG21LA011
- Event ID
- 20210105102496
- Case number
- ENG21LA011
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (5)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 28cdcc9220b35732b3eb1df8ef4c23ac60e3d71a8df03045623f12faac239749; retrieved 2026-09-16T13:32:53.000Z.
- Corrected after a review of the NTSB narrative, which states these values explicitly: destination. X60 is Williston Municipal Airport in Williston, FL; the recorded city name is misspelled.