FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

ERA20LA328 · Rockwell S2R

21 Sept 2020 · Hamilton, GA, United States

North Valley Aircraft Rockwell S2R · Accident: fuel exhaustion en route

From Cross City Airport (CTY) to LaGrange Callaway Airport (LGC)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
ERA20LA328
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
Event fatalities
Unknown
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Rockwell S2R

Aircraft type
Rockwell S2
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N7900V
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Cross City Airport (CTY), Cross City, FLTo LaGrange Callaway Airport (LGC), Lagrange, GA
Aircraft age
About 43 years (built 1977)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
En route
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Fuel exhaustion
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability
  • Aircraft › Fluids/miscellaneous hardware
  • Personnel issues › Task performance

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The pilot was ferrying the airplane for its new owner. According to the pilot, before the flight, he topped off the fuel and visually checked that the fuel tanks were full after allowing for equalization. He also noted that the fuel quantity indication system was inoperative. About 1 hour 35 minutes to 1 hour 45 minutes after takeoff, the airplane was cruising about 2,500 ft mean sea level when the engine lost total power. The pilot had been flying at a cruise power setting of 30 inches of manifold pressure at 2,000 rpm the entire flight. After the engine power loss, the pilot established best glide speed, shut off the fuel selector, and landed in a clearing in a forest. During the landing roll, the right wing struck a felled tree, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage and the right wing. Examination of the airplane and engine did not reveal any evidence of preimpact mechanical failures or malfunctions that would have resulted in a loss of power. It did reveal that the fuel tanks were empty of fuel, that the fuel strainer did not contain any fuel, and that the carburetor float bowl contained only 3 to 4 ounces of fuel. Both magnetos from the dual-magneto ignition system were tested and found to be functional. The left magneto "P" lead was found to have erratic indications when the magneto switch was placed in the BOTH or L positions. The reason for the erratic indications was an intermittent short between the shielding and the center conductor. This intermittent short would have occasionally led to intermittent operation of the left magneto; however, the right magneto would have continuously provided ignition spark during the flight. According to the previous airplane owner, if the pilot did not stop to refuel between the departure point and where the accident occurred, he was at risk of running out of fuel. He explained that the airplane’s engine was a geared radial engine that burned a large amount of fuel, typically about 50 gallons per hour. The previous owner also explained that the pilot departed before he arrived at the airport, so he did not go over the airplane with the pilot. He stated that there was a pilot’s operating handbook (POH) in the airplane. According to the new airplane owner, he had talked with the pilot the previous day and suggested the pilot study the POH regarding fuel burn and that the first leg of the flight be limited to 1 hour to ensure the actual fuel burn was as expected. The pilot later reported that, although he knew that the fuel quantity indicating system was inoperative before takeoff, he chose to fly because he "had good data as to what the aircraft's fuel burn should be per hour." The pilot also reported that although he had over 1,200 hours in the accident airplane make and model (S2R), the accident flight was the first time he had flown an S2R with a radial engine. Review of published data for the engine revealed that the maximum cruise power setting was 26 inches of manifold pressure and 2,000 rpm with a fuel burn rate of about 32 gallons per hour. Therefore, the engine power setting used by the pilot during the flight (30 inches at 2,000 rpm) exceeded the published maximum setting and would have markedly increased the rate of fuel consumption. The pilot’s decision to operate the engine beyond the indicated maximum power setting was likely due to his unfamiliarity with the engine installed on the airplane. The available evidence is consistent with a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Probable cause

The pilot’s inadequate preflight planning and improper operation of the engine beyond its indicated maximum cruise power setting, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record ERA20LA328
Event ID
20200921X32730
Case number
ERA20LA328
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 59f4a87fade36f0aa8f9aae68a0941d77b4d6d088778f6415b12e057dda649f0; retrieved 2026-09-16T13:04:43.036Z.