FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

ERA19FA201 · Beech E55 UNDESIGNAT

26 Jun 2019 · Hope Mills, NC, United States

Industrial Power Beech E55 UNDESIGNAT · Accident: loss of control in flight on approach

From Fayetteville Regional Airport - Grannis Field (FAY) to Fayetteville Regional Airport - Grannis Field (FAY)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
ERA19FA201
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
2 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
1
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Beech E55 UNDESIGNAT

Aircraft type
Beechcraft 55
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N664AR
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Fayetteville Regional Airport - Grannis Field (FAY), Hope Mills, NCTo Fayetteville Regional Airport - Grannis Field (FAY), Hope Mills, NC
Aircraft age
About 40 years (built 1979)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Approach · VFR pattern base
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Loss of control in flight
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Destroyed

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision

Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

Three days before the accident flight, the accident pilot flew two friends/pilots on a cross-country flight in the accident airplane. According to one of the friends, during the first leg of that trip, the attitude and heading reference system (AHRS) fail amber caution light illuminated in the cockpit at engine startup and remained illuminated for 12 to 15 minutes, which included the initial portion of the flight. They discussed continuing the flight under visual flight rules because the autopilot would not engage with the caution light illuminated and would not remain engaged if the caution light illuminated. During the time the caution light was illuminated, no anomalies were observed with the electronic flight information system (EFIS) display. The caution light extinguished, and the accident pilot engaged the autopilot for the remainder of the flight leg. During the return flight, the light remained extinguished and the accident pilot used the autopilot; however, after landing, he turned off the avionics and then back on, and the light illuminated for 3 minutes before he shut down the airplane. He planned to take the airplane to an avionics maintenance facility and also commented that he planned to perform three night landings to maintain his night currency. On the evening of the accident flight, the accident pilot visited the maintenance facility and was informed that the repair related to the AHRS fail light illumination had not been completed because the facility needed to contact the EFIS manufacturer for more information. The accident pilot elected to fly the airplane without the repair having been completed. The accident flight was cleared for takeoff, and about 2 minutes later, the pilot reported a problem to air traffic control but did not specify what the problem was; he stated that he wanted to turn around and land. but the pilot noted that there was an “awful lot of control wheel weight.” The flight was cleared to land, and the pilot subsequently stated, "it's really wanting to pitch down bad for some reason." A witness, who was walking his dog at the time, reported seeing the airplane veer sharply, followed by a steep descent about a 45° angle, just prior to impact. The airplane subsequently impacted a residence and terrain about 2 miles southwest of the approach end of the runway. Examination of the engines did not reveal any preimpact mechanical malfunctions and flight control continuity was confirmed. Examination of the autopilot programming unit and engine monitor revealed that they did not contain any nonvolatile memory. The investigation could not determine if the pilot was troubleshooting or attempting to use the autopilot during the accident flight. Postaccident testing of the clutch tension of the pitch servo revealed the breakaway force needed was 45 lbs. However, the specified required clutch tension breakaway force setting was 13 +/- 2 lbs. This setting was achieved by tightening the castle nut enough to reach the required force. After that, an orange torque seal strip was applied and a cotter pin was installed. Further examination revealed that the cotter pin used to secure the castle nut retaining the clutch appeared to be new, and the castle nut did not align with the factory orange torque strip setting applied at the time of servo completion and final testing. The orange torque strip on the nut and the orange torque strip on the tension washer were about 3/4 of a turn off. At some point during previous maintenance, the castle nut securing the clutch on the servo was overtightened, which caused the breakaway force needed to be 30 lbs over the specified limit. The overtightened clutch would have greatly increased the force required to override the clutch of the pitch servo. The pilot operating handbook for the airplane make/model indicated that an uncommanded pitch could be stopped by: turning off the autopilot master switch; pull the autopilot and trim circuit breakers; turn off the radio master switch; turn off the electrical master switch; push the GA switch on the throttle grip; or push TEST EACH FLT switch on autopilot controller..

Probable cause

The pilot's failure to disengage an uncommanded nose-down pitch input. Contributing to the accident was improper maintenance of the pitch trim servo, which would have precluded a physical override of the pitch servo.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record ERA19FA201
Event ID
20190628X04252
Case number
ERA19FA201
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: local date, investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date; the NTSB stores the UTC date 2019-06-27.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: af055d7207afcdcfeb5444395b376799b4fda8f5ef5f9b1f0d5f6d6d05ed12ae; retrieved 2026-09-13T17:58:52.541Z.