WPR19FA172 · Nanchang CJ6 A
Nanchang CJ6 A · Accident: controlled flight into terrain/object (CFIT) en route
From Zamperini Field (TOA) to Columbia Airport (O22)
Event
- NTSB case
- WPR19FA172
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- API-reported fatalities
- 1 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Nanchang CJ6 A
- Aircraft type
- Nanchang CJ6
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N269AG
- Operator
- Unknown
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Zamperini Field (TOA), Torrance, CATo Columbia Airport (O22), Columbia, CA
- Aircraft age
- About 40 years (built 1979)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- En route · cruise
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Controlled flight into terrain/object (CFIT)
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
- Personnel issues › Action/decision
Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
After departure, the airplane maneuvered around the coastline and then flew on a northerly heading toward the destination airport. During the final segment of the flight, the airplane gradually climbed from an altitude of 2,300 ft mean sea level (msl) to an altitude of 3,025 ft msl before being lost off radar. The airplane impacted rising terrain, in a level attitude, at an elevation of about 3,000 ft. Recorded weather information indicated marginal visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The lowest cloud layer was reported as overcast at 1,300 ft above ground level (agl); however, the cloud layer was likely lower at the higher elevation of the accident site. Weather advisories for instrument meteorological conditions and mountain obscuration were in effect at the time of the accident; however, it is unknown whether the pilot obtained weather information for the flight before his departure. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed leading edge damage to both wings and crushing damage to the front section of the airplane, indicative of a controlled flight into terrain. No evidence was observed of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Toxicology testing of the pilot’s blood detected the presence of two sedating medications: diphenhydramine and zolpidem. However, the medications were detected at levels not likely to have a significant impact on performance. Thus, effects from the pilot’s use of these medications likely did not contribute to the accident. Based on the level attitude of the airplane when it impacted the rising terrain, it is likely the pilot encountered a cloud layer en route to his destination and was unable to see the terrain before impact because it was obscured by the low cloud ceiling.
Probable cause
The pilot’s continued flight into marginal visual meteorological conditions, which resulted in controlled flight into terrain.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record WPR19FA172
- Event ID
- 20190616X20915
- Case number
- WPR19FA172
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, cause areas. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 607c6eb797d2cf99df64dddd7f689e0bf171a48407199418644eb3ce352595b2; retrieved 2026-09-15T07:00:01.963Z.