FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

WPR18LA271 · Cessna TU206 G

20 Sept 2018 · Brenham, TX, United States

US Department of Agriculture Cessna TU206 G · Accident: fuel starvation on approach

From San Angelo Regional Mathis Field (SJT) to Brenham Municipal Airport (11R)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
WPR18LA271
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
0 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
Government
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Cessna TU206 G

Aircraft type
Cessna 206
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N756NN
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From San Angelo Regional Mathis Field (SJT), San Angelo, TXTo Brenham Municipal Airport (11R), Brenham, TX
Aircraft age
About 41 years (built 1977)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Public Aircraft
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Approach
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Fuel starvation
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Fluids/miscellaneous hardware
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision
  • Personnel issues › Task performance

Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

After completing a photographic mission, the pilot determined that there was adequate fuel remaining to reach his intended destination with a 45-minute reserve. During the landing approach, the engine began to lose power and the pilot switched from the left to right fuel tank, which the fuel gauges indicated had more fuel remaining; however, the engine did not respond, and shortly thereafter, the engine lost total power. The airplane impacted trees and a fence during the subsequent forced landing short of the runway.

Enough fuel for about one hour of flight was drained from the right main fuel tank after the accident, but both the tip tanks and the left main tank were empty. Examination did not reveal any pre-impact anomalies with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation.

The pilot reported that he switched fuel tanks every hour during the flight but had failed to select the fuller tank during the landing approach as required by the manufacturer's Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH). Allowing a tank to run dry was allowable per the POH, but it required the engagement of the auxiliary fuel pump after the other tank was selected. Likewise, the emergency procedures for an engine failure in flight required the use of the auxiliary fuel pump.

The pilot had correctly planned for the airplane’s fuel consumption but failed to select the fullest tank during the critical landing phase, which resulted in the loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. The pilot stated that due to the airplane’s low altitude at the time of the loss of power, he did not have time to perform any items on the emergency checklist, and as such, did not turn on the fuel pump; however, the checklist was short and of sufficient significance that it should have been automatic to the pilot. Engagement of the fuel pump would likely have restarted the engine.

Probable cause

The pilot's improper fuel management during the landing approach, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. Contributing to the accident was his failure to follow the published emergency procedures after the loss of engine power.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record WPR18LA271
Event ID
20180921X14853
Case number
WPR18LA271
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 7bf4b4d0b8ab009ccc80b39d78e3b3b33fac47a4fed41b71fd7379ac695175e7; retrieved 2026-09-16T08:15:45.429Z.