FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

ERA18FA064 · Vans Aircraft Inc RV-12

22 Jan 2018 · Bonita Springs, FL, United States

Vans Aircraft Inc RV-12 · Accident: aircraft structural failure while maneuvering

From Page Field (FMY) to Everglades Airpark (X01)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
ERA18FA064
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
1 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Vans Aircraft Inc RV-12

Aircraft type
Vans RV-12
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N262WS
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Page Field (FMY), Fort Myers, FLTo Everglades Airpark (X01), Everglades City, FL
Aircraft age
About 7 years (built 2011)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Maneuvering
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Aircraft structural failure
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Destroyed

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures
  • Personnel issues › Task performance

Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The sport pilot departed on the visual flight rules (VFR) cross-country flight under day visual meteorological conditions and climbed the airplane to 2,500 ft. While on the ground and during the climb and cruise portions of the flight, the pilot missed or did not respond to numerous radio calls from air traffic controllers, deviated from assigned altitudes, and used improper radio terminology. Data from onboard the airplane indicated that, throughout the flight, the pilot operated the airplane within the yellow airspeed caution range in excess of its maximum structural cruise speed of 108 knots. About 4 minutes before the accident, he began a descent toward the destination airport. When the controller advised the pilot of nearby traffic, the pilot responded that he was looking. The airplane's pitch then increased slightly nose-up, followed by a significant pitch change to 45° nose-down and a right roll of 37°. The pilot transmitted "mayday, mayday." The roll continued through inverted and the airspeed eventually increased to 169 knots, which was 33 knots in excess of the airplane's never-exceed (redline) speed. During the final 10 seconds of recorded data, the engine speed varied between 4,550 and 5,950 rpm (redline rpm was 5,800).

The wreckage debris path and fracture signatures on the left wing indicated that it failed in-flight in a positive (wing up) direction, striking the airplane's canopy while departing the airplane. The wing spar fracture surfaces were consistent with overload with no evidence of preexisting corrosion or fatigue. It is likely that the wing failure occurred as the airplane descended and exceeded its redline speed. Although the airplane did not have a current condition inspection, there was no evidence of any preexisting mechanical malfunction or anomaly with the airplane or engine.

The pilot did not possess a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) medical certificate, nor was he required to in order to exercise the privileges of a sport pilot. According to personal medical records, he had been diagnosed with hypertension, high cholesterol, obstructive sleep apnea, neurogenic bladder, cataracts, peripheral neuropathy, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. It would have been the pilot's responsibility to report any medical deficiency that would interfere with the safe performance of sport pilot operations to the FAA; however, he did not do so. An autopsy of the pilot revealed an enlarged and thickened heart and significant coronary artery disease with about 50% to 75% narrowing of both the left main and left anterior descending coronary arteries. While possible, it could not be determined if the pilot experienced an acute cardiac event that may have affected his ability to control the airplane. Toxicology testing identified three different potentially impairing psychoactive medications in specimens of the pilot. What effects the pilot may have experienced from the use of this combination of medications could not be determined; additionally, the pilot's mental state at the time of the accident could not be established.

Overall, the pilot's coronary artery and significant psychiatric disease put him at risk for distraction and inattention that could have led to the accident circumstances. His unreported psychiatric disease, if not well-controlled, could have led to intentionally unsafe maneuvering. Whether the effects from multiple psychoactive medications contributed to the accident could not be determined, but it was evident that, based on his interaction with air traffic controllers, the pilot was not performing at a competent level. While the exact cause of the pilot's behavior could not be determined, given the lack of mechanical anomalies or weather phenomena that could explain the accident sequence, it is likely that his underlying physiologic or psychiatric disease resulted in his exceedance of the airplane's operating limitations, which led to an in-flight failure of the left wing while maneuvering.

Probable cause

The pilot's unsafe maneuvering and exceedance of the airplane's operating limitations, which resulted in an in-flight failure of the left wing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's underlying physiologic or psychiatric disease.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record ERA18FA064
Event ID
20180122X32841
Case number
ERA18FA064
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 4f472fdbdc252ab58471a75807eb9baeeda871d424994c0cc06cf5b146391c5e; retrieved 2026-09-15T06:30:26.322Z.