ERA17FA027 · Nanchang CJ6 A
Nanchang CJ6 A and Nanchang CJ6 A · Accident: midair collision while maneuvering
Event
- NTSB case
- ERA17FA027
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- API-reported fatalities
- 1 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Aircraft 1 · Nanchang CJ6 A
- Aircraft type
- Nanchang CJ6
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N10EB
- Operator
- Unknown
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Waycross Ware County Airport (AYS), Waycross, GATo Waycross Ware County Airport (AYS), Waycross, GA
- Aircraft age
- About 47 years (built 1969)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- Maneuvering
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Midair collision
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Aircraft 2 · Nanchang CJ6 A
- Aircraft type
- Nanchang CJ6
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N33CY
- Operator
- Unknown
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Waycross Ware County Airport (AYS), Waycross, GATo Waycross Ware County Airport (AYS), Waycross, GA
- Aircraft age
- About 31 years (built 1985)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- Maneuvering
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Midair collision
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Minor
Cause areas
- Personnel issues › Action/decision
Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
The accident occurred during the third formation of a four-airplane formation flight when two of the airplanes, call sign Bama 3 and call sign Bama 1, collided midair. After performing three successful formations involving pitchouts and rejoin maneuvers at an altitude of 2,500 ft msl, the pilots began a fourth rejoin maneuver. The lead airplane, Bama 1 was established in a right turning rejoin. The second airplane in the formation, Bama 2, joined the lead airplane on the inside of the turn, about 45° aft of Bama 1's right wing. The third airplane in the formation, Bama 3, was expected to approach from the inside of the turn and cross behind and under the formation to join the outside of the turn off of Bama 1's left wing. However, during the approach, the pilot of Bama 3 was forward of (actue), instead of behind, Bama 1's position. In addition, the Bama 3 airplane had a high closure rate, and the Bama 3 pilot did not announce that he was "overshooting" in accordance with the formation flying group's published guidelines; An overshoot is necessary to dissipate the energy of an approaching airplane with a high rate of closure by flying wide to the outside of the formation.
The pilot of Bama 1 saw that the Bama 3 pilot was approaching at an acute angle and high closure rate and instructed him over the radio to "take it to the outside" to overshoot. As Bama 3 approached Bama 1 from the right, the Bama 1 pilot saw Bama 3 pass under his airplane from the right and expected to see the airplane emerge off of Bama 1's left side. However, the pilot of Bama 2 reported that, as Bama 3 passed under Bama 1, Bama 3 climbed steeply and collided with Bama 1. The propeller of Bama 1 struck the tail of Bama 3 as it climbed, severing the tail from the airplane. Bama 3 then pitched down, entered uncontrolled flight, and impacted terrain.
Initially, the pilot of Bama 3 mismanaged the rejoin maneuver by closing with the lead at to high of a rate, remaining forward of the lead airplane, and not recognizing that his airplane was directly approaching the lead airplane. He then failed to properly conduct an overshoot maneuver that would take him below and behind the lead airplane and instead, passed directly underneath the lead airplane from the right and initiated a climb before his airplane was clear of the lead, which resulted in the collision.
The autopsy results for the Bama 3 pilot found evidence of mild coronary artery disease, which did not affect the pilot's performance during the accident flight. Toxicological testing indicated that the Bama 3 pilot had used marijuana, but the amount of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, the active component in marijuana) was too low to be quantified. While the amount of THC's inactive metabolite could be quantified, there was not sufficient evidence to determine whether the pilot's marijuana use contributed to the accident.
Probable cause
The Bama 3 pilot's failure to properly conduct an overshoot maneuver and his premature climb before he was clear of the lead airplane, Bama 1, which lead to a midair collision.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record ERA17FA027
- Event ID
- 20161021X72937
- Case number
- ERA17FA027
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 837302a7e6e225c3bd6802cf3da3b7165701de9f3e8a1a8a58d532a6f8c6847c; retrieved 2026-09-13T18:09:25.475Z.