ERA13LA408 · Piper PA-24-250
Piper PA-24-250 · Accident: fuel exhaustion en route
From Southbridge Municipal Airport (3B0) to Danielson Airport (LZD)
Narrative check · The NTSB narrative appears to contradict this record's location. Values are shown as recorded, not corrected; compare with the narrative.
Event
- NTSB case
- ERA13LA408
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- API-reported fatalities
- 0 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Piper PA-24-250
- Aircraft type
- Piper PA-24
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N7333P
- Operator
- Elms John H JR · private individual
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Southbridge Municipal Airport (3B0), Southbridge, MATo Danielson Airport (LZD), Danielson, CT
- Aircraft age
- About 52 years (built 1961)
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- En route · cruise
- Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Fuel exhaustion
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
- Aircraft › Fluids/miscellaneous hardware
- Personnel issues › Task performance
Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
The pilot reported that the airplane's digital cockpit fuel gauges indicated that each of the two wing tanks contained about 5 gallons of fuel before departure for the 10- to 15-minute flight. About 4 miles from the destination airport, the engine began to run roughly, and the pilot switched the fuel tank selector from the left wing tank to the right wing tank. The engine continued to run roughly and subsequently experienced a total loss of power. The pilot conducted a forced landing to a cornfield, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage and wings. During postaccident examination, the fuel quantity gauges indicated that no fuel remained, and no fuel was observed in either of the wing fuel tanks. Recovery personnel drained a total of 2 gallons of fuel from the airplane before its recovery from the field. An engine test run was performed, and the engine started and ran smoothly and without interruption through all power settings. Despite the pilot's report that a bird strike precipitated the total loss of engine power, no evidence of a bird strike was observed during a postaccident examination of the wreckage.
The pilot's operating handbook stated that, at an engine power setting of 75-percent-rated horsepower, the fuel consumption rate was about 14 gallons per hour, or about 0.23 gallon per minute. Given this fuel consumption rate, a 15-minute flight would have consumed about 3.5 gallons, not including the fuel required for engine startup, taxi, and takeoff. The pilot used the digital cockpit fuel gauges as his only indication of the fuel level and did not confirm the displayed quantity either visually or with another fuel measurement device before takeoff.
Probable cause
The pilot’s improper preflight inspection, which resulted in fuel exhaustion and a total loss of engine power.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record ERA13LA408
- Event ID
- 20130909X11953
- Case number
- ERA13LA408
- Dataset
- full-current
- Source SHA-256
- 5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 39c709d07748e63531168407a05f2cf65355754cd352bdf2e39d3ba15299a679; retrieved 2026-09-15T22:47:48.495Z.