FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

WPR13FA400 · Cantrell LW CHALLENGER II SP

8 Sept 2013 · Prineville, OR, United States

Cantrell LW CHALLENGER II SP · Accident: flight control system malfunction/failure while maneuvering

From Prineville Airport (S39) to Prineville Airport (S39)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
WPR13FA400
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
1 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Cantrell LW CHALLENGER II SP

Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N65VG
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Prineville Airport (S39), Prineville, ORTo Prineville Airport (S39), Prineville, OR
Aircraft age
About 15 years (built 1998)
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Maneuvering
Defining eventThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Flight control system malfunction/failure
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems

Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

Witnesses near the accident site reported observing the accident airplane fly near their location at a low altitude. They reported that the airplane oscillated up and down multiple times and that the tail's flight control surfaces appeared to be moving erratically before the airplane descended into terrain.

Postaccident examination of the wreckage revealed that both the left and right elevator control torque tubes were fractured and that the fracture areas were consistent with overload. Also, both the forward and aft set of rivets on the right control tube and the aft rivet on the left control tube that connect the outer sleeve to the smaller portions of the control torque tubes were made of an aluminum alloy material; the manufacturer's assembly instructions require that stainless steel rivets to be installed. Evidence of chafing and impact marks were observed near the separation area of the left control tube, indicating that the torque tube likely separated in flight and restricted the right elevator control movement.

A family member, who had previously flown in the accident airplane with the pilot, reported that the airplane had been experiencing abnormally high vibrations from the tail section during high-speed flight (when approaching about 90 miles per hour [mph]) and that the control stick would slam forward. The mechanic who conducted the airplane's last condition inspection about 3 months before the accident reported that he did not note any abnormal wear on the elevator flight controls. When he flew the airplane after completing the inspection, he noticed a buffet during and after throttling back in descent. The mechanic noted that the pilot had mentioned to him that he had the same problem in addition to the airplane experiencing heavy vibrations and the control stick slamming forward during flight at 90 mph, which is consistent with the family member's statement. The mechanic reported that he and the pilot inserted gap strips between the horizontal stabilizer and elevators. He also stated that the pilot had increased the angle of incidence on the elevators but that he was not sure how or when the pilot performed these adjustments. The airplane maintenance records were not located, and it could not be determined when the torque tube rivets were last installed or when maintenance was last performed on the elevator flight controls.

Probable cause

The in-flight failure of the left elevator control torque tube. Contributing to the accident was the improper assembly of the elevator control torque tubes.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record WPR13FA400
Event ID
20130908X63200
Case number
WPR13FA400
Dataset
full-current
Source SHA-256
5cf380f0061817c0331a6b2d8cc7e0ee3a79bea469a1001dc5c10e56f35f5ab3
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: ae2cc7672fe5cf65c173003a23e9262011dd9deec82a9d28b4e9ef395280c5b1; retrieved 2026-09-14T16:03:43.127Z.