FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

CHI05CA032 · Olson Sonex

21 Nov 2004 · Oconomowoc, WI, United States

Olson Sonex · Accident: total loss of engine power (mechanical failure) en route

From Watertown Municipal Airport (RYV) to RYV

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
CHI05CA032
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
0 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Olson Sonex

Aircraft type
Olson SONEX
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N478SX
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Watertown Municipal Airport (RYV), Watertown, WITo RYV
Aircraft age
Not recorded
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
En route · cruise
First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Total loss of engine power (mechanical failure)
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Engine assembly, crankshaft › Fatigue
  • Engine assembly, crankshaft › Fractured
  • Owner/builder › Maintenance, inspection, not performed

Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The amateur-built airplane was damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power during cruise flight. The propeller and hub separated in-flight as result of a crankshaft failure. The airplane impacted a small ditch during the forced landing that resulted in the airplane nosing-over. The experimental airplane was powered by a non-certified Volkswagen 2180cc engine that was modified for aircraft use. The engine crankshaft was fractured between the oil-slinger and the retaining snap-ring groves. The fracture initiated at the aft edge of the forward keyway. The fracture features were consistent with a fatigue-type failure. The propeller and hub were not recovered during the investigation. The pilot/builder reported that he had mistakenly installed the number four (aft-most) bearing at the number two position during initial assembly of the engine. He had to remove the shrink-fit propeller hub, drive gears and spacer in order to reinstall the bearings in the correct order. The pilot/builder reported that he did not check the dimensions of the shrink-fit components prior to reassembling the engine, nor did he consult with the engine kit manufacturer on how to disassemble, inspect, and reassemble the engine components. The engine kit manufacturer did not provide the builder with engine disassembly or overhaul instructions with delivery of the engine kit. The engine kit manufacturer did not instruct builders to verify the dimensions of the shrink-fit components prior to their installation. The experimental airframe and engine did not have to comply with federal regulations required for a standard category airplane. The engine and airframe had accumulated 45.3 hours since new.

Probable cause

The loss of engine power due to a fatigue fracture of the crankshaft. An additional cause to the accident was the pilot/builder's failure to verify the dimensions of the shrink-fit crankshaft components prior reassembling the engine. A factor to the accident was the ditch encountered during the forced landing.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record CHI05CA032
Event ID
20041217X02002
Case number
CHI05CA032
Dataset
historical-pre2008
Source SHA-256
89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 26c86e368c603f9fb781d15a543d89af51c802b8664272cea41dcc12e1357238; retrieved 2026-09-21T09:10:46.180Z.