MIA03LA035 · Lonnie Johnson RV6A
Lonnie Johnson RV6A · Accident: partial loss of engine power (non-mechanical) en route
From Waycross Ware County Airport (KAYS) to Peachtree City Falcon Field (KFFC)
Event
- NTSB case
- MIA03LA035
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- API-reported fatalities
- 0 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- Unknown
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Lonnie Johnson RV6A
- Aircraft type
- Lonnie Johnson RV6
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N559LJ
- Operator
- Unknown
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Waycross Ware County Airport (KAYS), Waycross, GATo Peachtree City Falcon Field (KFFC), GA
- Aircraft age
- Not recorded
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- En route · cruise
- First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Partial loss of engine power (non-mechanical)
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Substantial
Cause areas
- Owner/builder › Aircraft/equipment inadequate
- Pilot in command › Carburetor heat, not selected
- Pilot in command › Unsuitable terrain or takeoff/landing/taxi area, encountered
Approximate · Coordinates from the NTSB case API, which marks them as estimated or does not say; no uncertainty radius is established.
NTSB narrative
The flight departed with full fuel tanks from the Waycross-Ware County Airport, en route to the Peachtree City Airport. About 1 hour into the flight the pilot noticed a slight rpm drop, he applied throttle to compensate for the rpm decrease. The pilot started the pre-descent procedures; he turned the auxiliary fuel pump on, applied carburetor heat, then reduced power, at this time the engine quit completely. The pilot repositioned the fuel selector, switched the auxiliary fuel pump off and on, turned carburetor heat on and off, all actions were unsuccessful in restoring engine power. The pilot established best glide airspeed, lowered full flaps, and while descending, the airplane contacted a raised sewer access. The airplane then impacted the ground and came to rest inverted. A witness reported observing black smoke trailing the airplane and heard the engine running rough. Examination of the airplane following recovery by an FAA inspector revealed the fuel tank vent lines were clear of obstructions. There was fuel found in the left wing and the right fuel tank was leaking fuel, the fuel boost pump operated electrically post accident. Fuel samples from the right wing and gascolator showed no fuel contamination. All spark plugs and inside ends of both exhaust pipes were found sooted. The carburetor heat system which consists of a 5 inches long by 2 inches in diameter pipe secured to the exhaust crossover pipe, a "Carb Heat Connector" which is secured to the filtered air box forward of the air filter, and a scat hose that connects the two. Additionally, a control in the cockpit activates an alternate air door located on the filtered air box forward of the carb heat muff inlet The carburetor heat was able to function post accident and the engine was run to idle power setting; damage precluded operation at a higher rpm setting. Bench testing of the carburetor by the manufacturer with FAA oversight revealed the carburetor was not within service limits, at comparable to idle power settings the fuel flow in terms of pounds-per-hour (pph) was 0.6 pph below service limits. At the remaining four test points the fuel flow in pph was greater than the established rich limits. At the last test point which equated to full throttle, the fuel flow was 18.5 pph above the established rich service limit. The pilot reported verbally that approximately 50 flight hours earlier, when he was taxiing to takeoff, the engine quit just like it did during the accident flight. The carburetor and engine driven fuel pump were replaced. The engine quit again in a similar fashion, and the auxiliary fuel pump and all fuel lines were replaced. Additionally, the fuel selector valve was disassembled and rebuilt. The overhauled carburetor had been operated 54.5 hours since installation at the time of the accident. The temperature and dew point at Peachtree city, two hours past the time of the accident, indicates serious carburetor icing at any power setting. Flight testing of a RV6A airplane equipped with the same carburetor heat system, same model engine, and same model carburetor as the accident airplane but with a temperature probe revealed that with the engine operating at 75 percent power and carburetor heat applied, the temperature rise was 1/2 degree Fahrenheit above the temperature with carburetor heat off. According to the general manager of Van's Aircraft, they offer 2 different types of carburetor heat systems, and they have not done any heat rise testing on any of the various carburetor heat systems that can be installed on RV type airplanes. With respect to carburetor heat muffs, a section of the builders manual states that each builder is responsible for evaluating his/her own installation based on the liklihood of carburetor ice in his/her intended operating environment.
Probable cause
The failure of the pilot to activate carburetor heat control during cruise flight after experiencing a loss of engine rpm, inadequate carburetor heat system by the builder, and the unsuitable terrain encountered by the pilot-in-command during the forced landing following the total loss of engine power. A factor in the accident was the weather conditions ( temperature and dew point) which were susceptible to carburetor icing during cruise flight and descent.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record MIA03LA035
- Event ID
- 20030110X00044
- Case number
- MIA03LA035
- Dataset
- historical-pre2008
- Source SHA-256
- 89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status, coordinates. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 649c5a18d2a85ab0072bf51d19db38b9c85fce151f7a864f4ac6ad2a6a8d29fc; retrieved 2026-09-21T19:33:52.775Z.