FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

CHI02LA061 · Robinson R22

5 Jan 2002 · East Troy, WI, United States

Robinson R22 · Accident: hard landing

From East Troy Municipal Airport (57C) to an unrecorded destination

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
CHI02LA061
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
0 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
Unknown
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Robinson R22

Aircraft type
Robinson R22
Category
Helicopter
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N215WW
Operator
Unknown
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From East Troy Municipal Airport (57C), East Troy, WITo not recorded
Aircraft age
Not recorded
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Landing
First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Hard landing
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Dual student › Proper descent rate, not maintained

Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

The helicopter sustained substantial damage when the left, rear landing skid cross tube collapsed during landing. The CFI reported they taxied to the parallel taxiway of runway 26 to practice hovering autorotations. He reported, "I demonstrated three of them and then [the pilot receiving instruction] performed two. About a second or so after the touchdown on [the pilot receiving instruction's] 2nd hovering auto, the left skid collapsed and the helicopter slowly and gently rolled onto it's left side. The main rotor blades made contact with the ground and came to a stop." He reported, "All hovering autos were performed into the wind from a stabilized hover of 3-5 feet agl. All were terminated with the skids close to parallel with the taxiway without any hard landings." The cross tubes had about 1,500 hours since the last major overhaul. The aircraft had flown 9.6 hours since the last 100 hour inspection. An A&P mechanic reported he had examined the cross tubes during the 100 hour inspection. He reported the height of the tail measured 35 inches. The manufacturer's criteria for replacing the cross tubes is a measured tail height of 34 inches or less. The mating fractures from the left sides of the front and rear landing skid cross tubes were sent to the National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) Materials Laboratory for examination. The inspection revealed the following: "Magnified optical examinations of both fractures revealed features typical of overstress separations in aluminum tubes. In addition, the orientations and paths of the fractures along with associated deformation patterns were consistent with large upward loads on the skid ends of both tubes at the time of fracture. In addition to the local deformation at the fractures both tubes also displayed large radius upward bends along most of their lengths. No indications of preexisting fatigue or corrosion were apparent on the fractures or in the surrounding areas."

Probable cause

The pilot receiving instruction failed to maintain the proper descent rate.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record CHI02LA061
Event ID
20020114X00068
Case number
CHI02LA061
Dataset
historical-pre2008
Source SHA-256
89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: ef4c22f341ab3846ca21658a062bbcb45756a2819db4d21ddaf5dbe013c2f191; retrieved 2026-09-22T11:12:51.765Z.