FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

Aeromedical Services Intl Mitsubishi MU-2B-60 accident

9 Feb 1990 · Rapid City, SD, United States

Mitsubishi MU-2B-60 · Accident: total loss of engine power (mechanical failure) during initial climb

From Rapid City Regional Airport (RAP) to Winnipeg / James Armstrong Richardson International Airport (CYWG)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
DEN90FA055
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
1 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
0
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
Charter & commuter
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Mitsubishi MU-2B-60

Aircraft type
Mitsubishi MU-2
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N64MD
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Rapid City Regional Airport (RAP)To Winnipeg / James Armstrong Richardson International Airport (CYWG), MANITOBA,CANADA
Aircraft age
Not recorded
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Initial climb
First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Total loss of engine power (mechanical failure)
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Pilot in command › Aircraft control, not maintained
  • Pilot in command › Airspeed(vmc), not maintained

Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

WITNESSES RPRTD THAT SHORTLY AFTER LIFT-OFF, THE ACFT ENTERED AN UNUSUALLY STEEP, NOSE HIGH ATTITUDE, WHILE STILL AT LOW AIRSPEED. ONE WITNESS (AN ATP PLT) RPRTD THE ACFT ATTAINED AN ALT OF APRX 75 TO 100 FT AND APPEARED TO SLOW DOWN AND ENTER A VMC ROLL, THEN IT CRASHED. IMPACT OCCURRED IN AN INVERTED, NOSE DOWN ATTITUDE, LEFT OF THE RWY. AN INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT A COUPLING SHAFT (PN 865888-3) HAD FAILED IN THE LEFT ENG & THE LEFT PROP HAD FEATHERED. A METALLURICAL EXAM OF THE COUPLING SHOWED EVIDENCE OF FATIGUE.

Probable cause

FAILURE OF THE PILOT TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE AIRSPEED (VMC), WHICH RESULTED IN A LOSS OF AIRCRAFT CONTROL. A FACTOR RELATED TO THE ACCIDENT WAS: FATIGUE FAILURE OF A COUPLING SHAFT IN THE #1 ENGINE, WHICH RESULTED IN LOSS OF POWER IN THAT ENGINE.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record DEN90FA055
Event ID
20001212X22539
Case number
DEN90FA055
Dataset
historical-pre2008
Source SHA-256
89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 5f56658fb284e8487638e6c9453916641f7fcaed1d9c60cab814d009580cdecf; retrieved 2026-09-18T14:06:53.685Z.