FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

Continental Airlines Flight 60

25 Apr 2000 · Newark, NJ, United States

McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30 · Accident: partial loss of engine power (mechanical failure) during takeoff

From Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) to Brussels Airport (BRU)

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
NYC00FA122
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
0 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
0
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
Airline
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30

Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N39081
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)To Brussels Airport (BRU), Brussels
Aircraft age
Not recorded
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 121: Air Carrier
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
Takeoff · roll/run
First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Partial loss of engine power (mechanical failure)
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Manufacturer › Acft/equip, inadequate design
  • Turbine assembly, nozzle retention › Ruptured

Approximate · Estimated position: the centre of Newark, NJ, the place the record names. Not the accident site.

NTSB narrative

At V1, the DC-10-30's number 1 engine, a General Electric CF6-50C2, experienced a casing breach when the 2nd-stage low pressure turbine (LPT) anti-rotation nozzle locks failed. The breach occurred in the turbine plane, between approximately the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions. Debris from the breach resulted in collateral damage to the numbers 2 and 3 engines, the fuselage, and the left landing gear. In May 1993, the engine manufacturer issued a service bulletin to replace existing nozzle locks with ones that had thicker posts and arms. The change required modification of the LPT case nozzle lock holes. In March 1994, the manufacturer issued another service bulletin, SB 72-1082, which introduced a newly designed nozzle lock. The new locks, which were installed on the accident engine, utilized original diameter stud shanks, but were manufactured from a different material, and did not require modification of the LPT case. There were two previously reported failures of SB 72-1082 LPT nozzle locks, discovered during routine under-cowl inspections. In one case, all of the 2nd-stage nozzle locks were broken. The nozzle segments had rotated 120 degrees within the LPT case, but the case itself was not breached. In the second case, two 4th-stage nozzle locks had failed, but there was no collateral damage. According to the engine manufacturer, the failures were intergranular, "suggesting either stress rupture or sustained peak low cycle fatigue." Safety Board examination, of the only two recovered 2nd-stage nozzle locks from the accident engine, along with a section of casing with a nozzle lock stud attached, revealed intergranular fracture features, degradation at the surface of the fracture features, and grain boundaries, typical of oxidation damage. The intergranular fractures and oxidation damage found at the grain boundaries were consistent with stress rupture. An examination of a cracked 2nd stage nozzle lock, from a comparison engine, also revealed oxidation and intergranular fracture features, consistent with stress rupture.

Probable cause

Stress rupture of the 2nd-stage low pressure turbine anti-rotation nozzle locks, resulting from inadequate nozzle lock design.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record NYC00FA122
Event ID
20001212X20894
Case number
NYC00FA122
Dataset
historical-pre2008
Source SHA-256
89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: f7a15064e016902976684164c37b5dd2edff78c43b37dcb069db86c2db02f15e; retrieved 2026-09-18T16:39:22.606Z.