FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

DEN91LA095 · Bell 412

1 Jul 1991 · Grand Junction, CO, United States

Air Methods Bell 412 · Accident: airframe, component or system failure en route

From Grand Junction Regional Airport (GJT) to U43 · Monticello, UT

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
DEN91LA095
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
0 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
0
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Bell 412

Aircraft type
Bell 412
Category
Helicopter
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N20703
Operator
Air Methods
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Grand Junction Regional Airport (GJT), Grand Junction, COTo U43 · Monticello, UT
Aircraft age
Not recorded
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
En route · cruise
First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Airframe, component or system failure
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Substantial

Cause areas

  • Pilot in command › Rotor RPM, not maintained

Approximate · Coordinates as recorded by the NTSB; no uncertainty radius is established.

NTSB narrative

DURING CRUISE FLIGHT, THE ENGINE TO TRANSMISSION DRIVE SHAFT FORWARD COUPLING OVERHEATED AND FAILED. THE PILOT EXECUTE AN AUTORATATION. DURING THE LANDING FLARE, THE PILOT DID NOT MAINTAIN ADEQUATE ROTOR RPM AND THE HELICOPTER LANDED HARD RESULTING IN SKID COLLAPSE. COMPANY MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL DISPATCHED THE HELICOPTER WITH A KNOWN DRIVE SHAFT COUPLING GREASE LEAK WHICH THEY HAD ATTEMPTED TO STOP BY USING AN UNAPPROVED SILICON SEALANT. THEY HAD REPACKED THE 500 PLUS HOUR COUPLING TWO TIMES PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT. THE NORMAL REPACK INTERVAL WAS ONCE EVERY 600 HOURS. EXAMINATION OF THE FAILED DRIVE SHAFT DID NOT REVEAL ANY MISALIGNMENT, BUT DID ISOLATE HEAT RELATED FAILURE AREAS OF THE FORWARD COUPLING END.

Probable cause

THE PILOT'S FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE MAIN ROTOR RPM PRIOR TO TOUCHDOWN. FACTORS WERE: THE DISCONNECTED ENGINE TO TRANSMISSION DRIVE SHAFT AND THE INADEQUATE INSPECTION BY COMPANY MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record DEN91LA095
Event ID
20001212X17526
Case number
DEN91LA095
Dataset
historical-pre2008
Source SHA-256
89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date, which is the same as the UTC date the NTSB stores.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 3ffd48cbd76f90050aad42309f169f8fbf0754f12c45bdbe7dc211ea7993c32f; retrieved 2026-09-23T04:00:16.337Z.