FLIGHT FINDINGSAVIATION OCCURRENCE MAP
Back to map

LAX95LA067 · Harris BD-10

30 Dec 1994 · Gardnerville, NV, United States

Peregrine Flight International Harris BD-10 · Accident: airframe, component or system failure en route

From Minden-Tahoe Airport (MEV) to an unrecorded destination

Report a problem

Event

NTSB case
LAX95LA067
Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
Accident
InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
Completed
API-reported fatalities
1 · all aircraft and ground
Ground fatalities
0
OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
General aviation
WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
Visual Meteorological Cond

Harris BD-10

Aircraft type
Harris BD-10
Category
Airplane
RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
N9WZ
Onboard fatalities
Unknown
Route
From Minden-Tahoe Airport (MEV), Minden, NVTo not recorded
Aircraft age
Not recorded
Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
Part 91: General Aviation
Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
En route · cruise
First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
Airframe, component or system failure
DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
Destroyed

Cause areas

  • Production/design personnel › Acft/equip, inadequate design
  • Vertical stabilizer › Overload
  • Vertical stabilizer › Separation

Approximate · Estimated position: the centre of Gardnerville, NV, the place the record names. Not the accident site.

NTSB narrative

THE FLIGHT'S TEST CARD CONCERNED EXPANSION OF THE SPEED ENVELOPE FROM 370 TO 380 KIAS. ON AN EARLIER TEST FLIGHT AT 350 KIAS, THE SIDE LOAD FORCES ON THE VERTICAL STABILIZERS REACHED A COMPANY IMPOSED LIMIT OF 40 PERCENT OF THE ULTIMATE FAILURE LOAD DETERMINED BY THE DESIGNER. DURING THE RUN BETWEEN 375 AND 380 KNOTS, THE AIRCRAFT PITCHED VIOLENTLY NOSE UP FOLLOWED BY A GENERAL BREAKUP. THE COMPANY SAID THE ORIGINAL BEDE BUILT BD-10 PROTOTYPE SUSTAINED A VERTICAL STABILIZER FAILURE DURING FLIGHTS AT THE 1994 RENO AIR RACES. BEDE SUBSEQUENTLY DESIGNED A FIX WHICH STRENGTHENED THE VERTICAL TAILS. GROUND SUBSTANTIATION LOAD TESTS TO FAILURE WERE CONDUCTED BY BEDE, AND THE RESULTING YIELD FAILURE LOAD LIMIT WAS PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY, WHICH USED THE NUMBERS TO ESTABLISH THE 40 PERCENT FLIGHT TEST LIMIT. THE NEW FIX WAS INCORPORATED INTO THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT. WRECKAGE EXAMINATION REVEALED THAT THE AIRPLANE'S VERTICAL TAILS SUSTAINED STRUCTURAL OVERLOADS AND SEPARATED FROM THE AIRCRAFT IN FLIGHT. THE INTACT LEFT VERTICAL TAIL ASSEMBLY WAS FOUND EARLY IN THE WRECKAGE PATH AND EXHIBITED A CLEAN, ALMOST INSTANTANEOUS FAILURE LOAD WITH RIGHT BENDING AT THE SPAR TO FUSELAGE ATTACH POINTS. A PRODUCTION CONFIGURATION LEFT SIDE EMPENNAGE WAS BUILT, PUT IN A TEST FIXTURE, AND THE VERTICAL TAIL LOADED TO FAILURE. THE FAILURE MODE AND SEPARATION POINT WAS THE SAME AS THAT SEEN ON THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT LEFT VERTICAL TAIL ASSEMBLY. THE VERTICAL STABILIZER SPARS BEGAN TO YIELD AT 40 PERCENT OF THE FAILURE LOAD LIMIT SUPPLIED BY BEDE. SPAR FAILURE OCCURRED AT 65 PERCENT.

Probable cause

the in-flight overload failure of the left vertical stabilizer spars, at force levels substantially below the predicted ultimate failure loads, due to inadequate substantiation by the designer.

Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset

Sources

NTSB record LAX95LA067
Event ID
20001206X02760
Case number
LAX95LA067
Dataset
historical-pre2008
Source SHA-256
89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Source notes (4)
  • Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
  • Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: local date, investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
  • The date is the local date; the NTSB stores the UTC date 1994-12-31.
  • API snapshot SHA-256: 5759c6782ca502b54bdd44dbd507dc336c149a3d0c5d736c8d75d48be5125a77; retrieved 2026-09-20T23:54:10.351Z.