LAX95LA067 · Harris BD-10
Peregrine Flight International Harris BD-10 · Accident: airframe, component or system failure en route
From Minden-Tahoe Airport (MEV) to an unrecorded destination
Event
- NTSB case
- LAX95LA067
- Event typeAccident: someone killed or seriously injured, or the aircraft substantially damaged (NTSB definition). Incident: an occurrence that affected or could have affected safety, short of that. Glossary
- Accident
- InvestigationHow far the investigation had got when the record was published: preliminary, ongoing, final or completed. Unknown where the source does not say. Glossary
- Completed
- API-reported fatalities
- 1 · all aircraft and ground
- Ground fatalities
- 0
- OperationWhat kind of flying it was, grouped by the rules it flew under: airline (US Part 121), air taxi and commuter (Part 135), general aviation (Part 91 and similar), military or government. Glossary
- General aviation
- WeatherVisual meteorological conditions (VMC): good enough to fly by looking outside. Instrument conditions (IMC): cloud or low visibility, flying by instruments. Glossary
- Visual Meteorological Cond
Harris BD-10
- Aircraft type
- Harris BD-10
- Category
- Airplane
- RegistrationThe aircraft's tail number, such as N12345 or G-ABCD. Registrations are reissued, so the same one years apart can be a different aircraft. Glossary
- N9WZ
- Operator
- Peregrine Flight International
- Onboard fatalities
- Unknown
- Route
- From Minden-Tahoe Airport (MEV), Minden, NVTo not recorded
- Aircraft age
- Not recorded
- Flight rulesThe regulations the flight operated under: in the US, Part 91 (general aviation), Part 121 (airlines), Part 135 (air taxi and commuter) and others; for flights abroad, the NTSB's coarser commercial or non-commercial code. Glossary
- Part 91: General Aviation
- Phase of flightThe stage of the flight when things started to go wrong: standing, taxi, takeoff, initial climb, en route, maneuvering, approach or landing. Glossary
- En route · cruise
- First occurrenceThe single coded event the NTSB judges best describes what happened (records from 2008 on). Older records name the first occurrence in the sequence instead. Glossary
- Airframe, component or system failure
- DamageDestroyed: beyond practical repair. Substantial: damage that affects the structure, performance or handling and normally needs major repair. Minor: less than that. Glossary
- Destroyed
Cause areas
- Production/design personnel › Acft/equip, inadequate design
- Vertical stabilizer › Overload
- Vertical stabilizer › Separation
Approximate · Estimated position: the centre of Gardnerville, NV, the place the record names. Not the accident site.
NTSB narrative
THE FLIGHT'S TEST CARD CONCERNED EXPANSION OF THE SPEED ENVELOPE FROM 370 TO 380 KIAS. ON AN EARLIER TEST FLIGHT AT 350 KIAS, THE SIDE LOAD FORCES ON THE VERTICAL STABILIZERS REACHED A COMPANY IMPOSED LIMIT OF 40 PERCENT OF THE ULTIMATE FAILURE LOAD DETERMINED BY THE DESIGNER. DURING THE RUN BETWEEN 375 AND 380 KNOTS, THE AIRCRAFT PITCHED VIOLENTLY NOSE UP FOLLOWED BY A GENERAL BREAKUP. THE COMPANY SAID THE ORIGINAL BEDE BUILT BD-10 PROTOTYPE SUSTAINED A VERTICAL STABILIZER FAILURE DURING FLIGHTS AT THE 1994 RENO AIR RACES. BEDE SUBSEQUENTLY DESIGNED A FIX WHICH STRENGTHENED THE VERTICAL TAILS. GROUND SUBSTANTIATION LOAD TESTS TO FAILURE WERE CONDUCTED BY BEDE, AND THE RESULTING YIELD FAILURE LOAD LIMIT WAS PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY, WHICH USED THE NUMBERS TO ESTABLISH THE 40 PERCENT FLIGHT TEST LIMIT. THE NEW FIX WAS INCORPORATED INTO THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT. WRECKAGE EXAMINATION REVEALED THAT THE AIRPLANE'S VERTICAL TAILS SUSTAINED STRUCTURAL OVERLOADS AND SEPARATED FROM THE AIRCRAFT IN FLIGHT. THE INTACT LEFT VERTICAL TAIL ASSEMBLY WAS FOUND EARLY IN THE WRECKAGE PATH AND EXHIBITED A CLEAN, ALMOST INSTANTANEOUS FAILURE LOAD WITH RIGHT BENDING AT THE SPAR TO FUSELAGE ATTACH POINTS. A PRODUCTION CONFIGURATION LEFT SIDE EMPENNAGE WAS BUILT, PUT IN A TEST FIXTURE, AND THE VERTICAL TAIL LOADED TO FAILURE. THE FAILURE MODE AND SEPARATION POINT WAS THE SAME AS THAT SEEN ON THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT LEFT VERTICAL TAIL ASSEMBLY. THE VERTICAL STABILIZER SPARS BEGAN TO YIELD AT 40 PERCENT OF THE FAILURE LOAD LIMIT SUPPLIED BY BEDE. SPAR FAILURE OCCURRED AT 65 PERCENT.
Probable cause
the in-flight overload failure of the left vertical stabilizer spars, at force levels substantially below the predicted ultimate failure loads, due to inadequate substantiation by the designer.
Verbatim NTSB analysis and probable cause from the NTSB dataset
Sources
NTSB record LAX95LA067
- Event ID
- 20001206X02760
- Case number
- LAX95LA067
- Dataset
- historical-pre2008
- Source SHA-256
- 89e2df6d848e7ab3b42e7d7c7a03ff403303057a26ca04c95b3ea67201c3ce74
Source notes (4)
- Unreviewed is an editorial label, not an investigation status. API-sourced is not report-checked or human-reviewed. Explicit event totals are used without summing aircraft injury tables; onboard allocation is withheld. Unknown values remain unknown. The operation category is mapped from the NTSB-reported FAR part and has not been reviewed.
- Filled from the NTSB case API where the bulk record had no value: local date, investigation status. Values present in the bulk record are kept.
- The date is the local date; the NTSB stores the UTC date 1994-12-31.
- API snapshot SHA-256: 5759c6782ca502b54bdd44dbd507dc336c149a3d0c5d736c8d75d48be5125a77; retrieved 2026-09-20T23:54:10.351Z.